On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:00:07PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
That said, removing -p and -i option may be problematic. It should be
done upstream.
I'm tired of people complaining about the "unknown" entries. They're not
required and they are useless on these systems, so there's no point in
having t
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
> >get the required information.
>
> s/no way/no reasonable way/
>
> It is possible to parse /proc/cpuinfo (that's what the experiment
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
get the required information.
s/no way/no reasonable way/
It is possible to parse /proc/cpuinfo (that's what the experimental
patch in the debian coreutils-4.5.2-1 did) but that's a losin
Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=183858
>
> Given the information I previously provided, I do not even understand
> how it's possible to think that the bug 183858 is a kernel issue.
The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
get
I've just compiled coreutils 4.5.3 and still got the bug.
So the bug is maybe really a kernel issue, but informations when
closing bug is still important. And the bug exists, even if it need to
be reassigned.
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english sp
About http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=183858
Given the information I previously provided, I do not even understand
how it's possible to think that the bug 183858 is a kernel issue.
I'm not familiar with the kernel neither with coreutils code.
That said, I explicitely said when th
6 matches
Mail list logo
