On Sa, 15 Okt 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> quickly by using the "reject" and "approve" mechanism. When you view
Thanks for that hint, yes, that works actually much better.
No I only have to remember it ;-)
Best wishes
Norbert
-
Norbert Preining wrote:
> In the current transition to gnome3 (or it seems) I press
> U
> to update all packages, and then it suggests me to remove 30 or
> so packages.
>
> I know this game, normally I have to press "." a few times to come
> to the solution that simply keeps some of the pa
On Fr, 14 Okt 2011, Marvin Renich wrote:
> You can use "aptitude safe-upgrade --visual-preview", though this is not
> particularly convenient when already running the aptitude cua.
That was very useful, and actually works. Great.
> You can also check out "Aptitude::Always-Use-Safe-Resolver".
I a
On Fr, 14 Okt 2011, Jarek Kamiński wrote:
> > Not a solution for the interactive mode, or am I wrong?
>
> You can use aptitude --safe-resolver.
Didn't work either ... still not getting the best result. I still
get "6 removals, 1 keep" instead of "n keeps", and after 30 or so
proposals all removin
On Fr, 14 Okt 2011, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> priority set in /etc/apt/preferences? Mine looks like this and I
Good point. Strange enough I have a *very* strange /etc/apt/preferences
file that I don't remember to have *EVER* created:
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable-i386
Pin-Priority: 400
Pac
Na grupie linux.debian.devel napisałe(a)ś:
>>> Is there such an option? And if not, can we please please have one?
>> aptitude safe-upgrade has been around for years.
> Not a solution for the interactive mode, or am I wrong?
You can use aptitude --safe-resolver.
--
pozdr(); // Jarek
--
To U
* Miles Bader [111014 03:04]:
> Paul Wise writes:
> >> Not a solution for the interactive mode, or am I wrong?
> >
> > Not AFAICT, I only read the documentation rather than the code though.
>
> Kinda surprising, actually; this has long been the #1 most horrible
> thing about aptitude, and one ab
how can I teach aptitude to not be sooo incredible stupid?
In the current transition to gnome3 (or it seems) I press
Maybe experimental (where gnome3 currently resides) has the wrong
priority set in /etc/apt/preferences? Mine looks like this and I
regularly upgrade (through apt-get, though) wi
On Fr, 14 Okt 2011, Miles Bader wrote:
> [With the normal "U" command, for my typical usage, aptitude seems to
> choose the worst possible solution about 98% of the time.]
Agreed on that.
What is the most typical scenario sid people are hitting,
transitions in progress, and that is solved by keep
Paul Wise writes:
>> Not a solution for the interactive mode, or am I wrong?
>
> Not AFAICT, I only read the documentation rather than the code though.
Kinda surprising, actually; this has long been the #1 most horrible
thing about aptitude, and one about which there's been plenty of
complaining.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Not a solution for the interactive mode, or am I wrong?
Not AFAICT, I only read the documentation rather than the code though.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debia
Hi Paul,
On Fr, 14 Okt 2011, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Is there such an option? And if not, can we please please have one?
>
> aptitude safe-upgrade has been around for years.
Not a solution for the interactive mode, or am I wrong?
Best wishes
Norbert
---
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Is there such an option? And if not, can we please please have one?
aptitude safe-upgrade has been around for years.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Hi everyone, esp aptitude masters,
how can I teach aptitude to not be sooo incredible stupid?
In the current transition to gnome3 (or it seems) I press
U
to update all packages, and then it suggests me to remove 30 or
so packages.
I know this game, normally I have to press "." a few times
14 matches
Mail list logo
