On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 07:30 -0400, nick black wrote:
[...]
> If you accept my point of view that lackluster performance is a bug, I've
> been working on a bugfix, though admittedly a highly invasive one.
[...]
I'd like to thank you for working on APT performance, as I do feel it's
a weak point at
David, especially after reading
http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/10/people-behind-debian-david-kalnischkies-an-apt-developer/,
I can see how my original post would totally get under your skin. I
definitely didn't intend to do that; apologies!
This project was motivated by one major thing: certa
David Kalnischkies left as an exercise for the reader:
> You forgot to provide the source for your rewrite; the "library" is rather
> small to have a serious look at it even through a multithreaded cache would
> be interesting, but it not even builds as I miss a "blossom.h" which apt-file
> couldn'
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 08:28:14AM -0400, nick black wrote:
> (CC'd kinda widely, eh; feel free to trim responses)
>
> Hello there, Christoph!
>
> I've used apt-show-versions for years, and found it quite useful. It's a bit
> slow, though, and its need to update a root-owned disk cache is kind of
(CC'd kinda widely, eh; feel free to trim responses)
Hello there, Christoph!
I've used apt-show-versions for years, and found it quite useful. It's a bit
slow, though, and its need to update a root-owned disk cache is kind of
unfortunate.
As part of my RAPTORIAL project (https://github.com/danka
5 matches
Mail list logo
