Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But that's OK. Our amd64 users just use the Alioth site instead of our
> wonderful mirror network, and track it as unstable. I mean, it's so much
> more effective to have it all hitting alioth for download, right? Thought
> so.
Amd64 actualy has 14+ mirro
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:25:04PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> [snip]
> > But that's OK. Our amd64 users just use the Alioth site instead of our
> > wonderful mirror network, and track it as unstable. I mean, it's so much
> > more effective to have it all hitting alioth for d
Joel Aelwyn wrote:
[snip]
> But that's OK. Our amd64 users just use the Alioth site instead of our
> wonderful mirror network, and track it as unstable. I mean, it's so much
> more effective to have it all hitting alioth for download, right? Thought
> so.
You probably should inform yourself before
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:57:06PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:25 -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:11AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> [snip]
> > Oops. You jumped from "second most common" to "second most important",
> > as if they're synonym
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:57:06PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:25 -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:11AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> [snip]
> > Oops. You jumped from "second most common" to "second most important", as
> > if they're synony
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don Armstrong debian.org> writes:
> reports percent
> hurd-i386 1 0.0175
> kfreebsd-i386 1 0.0175
> ppc64 1 0.0175
> arm 2 0.0351
> mipsel 2 0.0351
> m68k
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:11AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Just because an arch is fairly unused doesn't mean we should drop
it. We should drop an arch just like we would drop a package - if it
doesn't work, no one wants to maintain it, and if keeping it would
delay release.
--
Petri
[Dirk Eddelbuettel]
> [1] I removed the entry "unknown" -- this corresponds to assuming that
> "unknown" as population corresponds to the distribution of all "known"
> dists shown here. Lacking knowledge of what drives "unknown", this
> appears fair. If someone has a breakdown o
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:25 -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:11AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[snip]
> Oops. You jumped from "second most common" to "second most important", as
> if they're synonymous. Maybe they are to some people, but that's not at all
> beyond de
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:25:25 -0500
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:11AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > reports percent
> > hurd-i386 1 0.0175
> > kfreebsd-i386 1 0.0175
> > ppc64 1 0.0175
> > arm
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:11AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> reports percent
> hurd-i386 1 0.0175
> kfreebsd-i386 1 0.0175
> ppc64 1 0.0175
> arm 2 0.0351
> mipsel 2 0.0351
> m68k3 0.0526
>
Don Armstrong debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > Thanks for cutting and completely ignoring the part where I
> > demonstrated the lack of usage beyond i386 and maybe four or five
> > other arches.
>
> You used package download results from one (1!) debian mirr
12 matches
Mail list logo
