Re: amarok 2 in squeeze

2009-09-07 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-09-07, Andrew R Kelley wrote: > --000e0cd3b27cf19d880472f5f8d4 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Can we have amarok 1.4 as an option to use? in my opinion, amarok 2 is not > usable yet. I decided to give it a try when it replaced 1.4 in squeeze, but > it's missing many 1.4

amarok 2 in squeeze

2009-09-06 Thread Andrew R Kelley
Can we have amarok 1.4 as an option to use? in my opinion, amarok 2 is not usable yet. I decided to give it a try when it replaced 1.4 in squeeze, but it's missing many 1.4 features and has many unstable glitches that were not present in 1.4. Currently when I run amarok I get a dcop no reply error