* Ondrej Sury:
> I think that this could be delicate issue, because evolution creates DB
> files in .evolution and it has to be migrated automaticaly for an user.
Which Berkeley DB feature set is needed by evolution?
The database format itself has not changed since 4.0, so no migration
would be
> FWIW, this is just about the same response I got from upstream when I
> asked them about the issue. The solution is of course to get rid of
> libdb and use tdb or something equivalent.
Maybe you should convince bogofilter upstream to keep supporting tdb.
They're dropping it on the grounds that
* Ondrej Sury
| I think that this could be delicate issue, because evolution creates DB
| files in .evolution and it has to be migrated automaticaly for an user.
| So bug is OK, but NMU would not be AFAIK welcomed, since it could broke
| user addressbooks, etc.
|
| Takuo, am I right?
FWIW, this
2005-07-31 (日) の 22:34 +0200 に Ondrej Sury さんは書きました:
> On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 15:32 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > libdb4.1 should be removed from Debian soon. The following packages
> > still use it (but could move forward to the more recent db4.2 or db4.3
> > package):
> >
> > libed
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 15:32 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libdb4.1 should be removed from Debian soon. The following packages
> still use it (but could move forward to the more recent db4.2 or db4.3
> package):
>
> libedataserver1.2-4
> evolution-exchange
> evolution-data-server1.2
> evol
Hi,
libdb4.1 should be removed from Debian soon. The following packages
still use it (but could move forward to the more recent db4.2 or db4.3
package):
arla
kerberos4kth-servers
vacation
libedataserver1.2-4
libroken16-kerberos4kth
kerberos4kth-kdc
libapache-mod-witch
libotp0-kerberos4kth
evolutio
6 matches
Mail list logo
