On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 22:39:41 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> For a start, it would probably make sense to file Priority: important
> bugs on sun-java5 and sun-java6 describing the breakage. Then wait a
> bit, and if upstream is too busy with other things like OpenJDK to
> address the issue, up
* Steve Langasek:
> "unstable" doesn't mean "it's ok to upload packages with known bugs
> that render the system unusable to many users and drives them away
> from using unstable because they're using non-free software and that
> shouldn't matter to us". The consequences of breaking Java for most
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 03:08:35PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Thursday 19 April 2007 03.15:21 David Nusinow wrote:
> > We
> > need to push XCB forward though, and how to deal with the java bug
> > mentioned in that post isn't clear yet.
> What I don't quite understand is how a non-free p
On Thursday 19 April 2007 03.15:21 David Nusinow wrote:
> We
> need to push XCB forward though, and how to deal with the java bug
> mentioned in that post isn't clear yet.
What I don't quite understand is how a non-free package should block this
upgrade.
Yes, Java is used by a lot of people and
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:57:08PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> If anyone has any mysterious contacts at Sun that they could talk to about
> this, that'd be great. They've got the bug report in their database, and
> since the whole "java-in-debian" thing was a totally backroom affair, I
> have no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:57:08PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> If anyone has any mysterious contacts at Sun that they could talk to about
> this, that'd be great.
isn't there this new guy at Sun called 'ian murdoch' ;-)
- --
| .''`. == Debian GNU/
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:13:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:15:21PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Also of major note, Julien clarified my post a bit in the comments. Most of
> > 7.2 is actually in unstable, including the drivers (in addition, we have
> > pre-relea
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:15:21PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Also of major note, Julien clarified my post a bit in the comments. Most of
> 7.2 is actually in unstable, including the drivers (in addition, we have
> pre-release drivers for intel in experimental). The missing thing though is
> the
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 08:31:04AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Just a quick heads-up for those who don't read planet and have been
> wondering why Xorg 7.2 is lingering in experimental: There's an excellent
> announcement on David Nusinov's blog at
> <htt
Yo!
Just a quick heads-up for those who don't read planet and have been
wondering why Xorg 7.2 is lingering in experimental: There's an excellent
announcement on David Nusinov's blog at
<http://gravityboy.livejournal.com/34738.html>. I wish such stuff would be
posted to
10 matches
Mail list logo
