Re: Would like to remove blas/lapack/atlas2/lapack99 at some point

2005-02-24 Thread Camm Maguire
Hi Kevin! Of course, post-Sarge is just fine! Please excuse me if I implied otherwise. You and I have already coordinated on this. If memory serves, libmathlib1 is not the only issue. mpqc, ghemical, and tela are there too. I'm checking the BTS, and can't find the analogous wishlist bugs agai

Re: Would like to remove blas/lapack/atlas2/lapack99 at some point

2005-02-23 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! The older versions were kept to ease the transition into a > minor API change, and to work around earlier gcc-induced tester > failures. There are just a few packages using the older API now. > I've filed wishlist bugs with those requesting an upgrade about 100 >

Would like to remove blas/lapack/atlas2/lapack99 at some point

2005-02-23 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! The older versions were kept to ease the transition into a minor API change, and to work around earlier gcc-induced tester failures. There are just a few packages using the older API now. I've filed wishlist bugs with those requesting an upgrade about 100 days ago. How should we proce