On Monday 11 September 2006 19:17, Frank Küster wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> > On Sep 11, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> That's the version in testing, but the source package in sid also has
> >> all that's needed to get it in again, unless there's a hard-to-see
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> There is a /etc/init.d/udev script provided by the udev package, but as
>> it
>> seems no entity cares to start it at boot time to populate the /dev
>> directory. Are there any good reasons for udev not to call update-rc.d from
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> On Sep 11, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That's the version in testing, but the source package in sid also has
>> all that's needed to get it in again, unless there's a hard-to-see
>> subtle error.
> Like the update-rc.d bug discussed here i
On Sep 11, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's the version in testing, but the source package in sid also has
> all that's needed to get it in again, unless there's a hard-to-see
> subtle error.
Like the update-rc.d bug discussed here in the last few days.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> There is a /etc/init.d/udev script provided by the udev package, but as
> it
> seems no entity cares to start it at boot time to populate the /dev
> directory. Are there any good reasons for udev not to call update-rc.d from
> its post
Hello,
There is a /etc/init.d/udev script provided by the udev package, but as
it
seems no entity cares to start it at boot time to populate the /dev
directory. Are there any good reasons for udev not to call update-rc.d from
its postinst to install the necessary symlinks in place ? Nex
6 matches
Mail list logo
