-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2004 05:53 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
| albeit both are Priority: important, sysklogd is Section: base. and,
| iiuc, base should be self-contained (that is, packages in base must
| not depend on packages outside it).
well, logrotate is almo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2004 01:10 AM, Martin Schulze wrote:
| Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
|
|>Hi,
|>
|>I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
|>scripts and not logrotate.
|
|
| Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:39:51PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:29:36 +0100, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Please send me the patch.
> Honestly, looking at sysklogd's bug list doesn't make people get the
> impression that it makes sense to file patches against
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:29:36 +0100, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Please send me the patch.
Honestly, looking at sysklogd's bug list doesn't make people get the
impression that it makes sense to file patches against the sysklogd
package.
Greetings
Marc
--
---
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Clemens Schwaighofer [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:02:44 +0900]:
> > I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> > scripts and not logrotate.
>
> albeit both are Priority: important, sysklogd is Section: base. and,
Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:10:43PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> > > I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> > > scripts and not logrotate.
> >
> > Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:42:09 +0400, "Nikita V. Youshchenko"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> and before anybody asks, I already but all the things into logrotate. I
>> just curious why its not there from beginning.
>
>With current default configuration, if I add some more log files
>info /etc/syslog.c
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:10:43PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> > I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> > scripts and not logrotate.
>
> Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it still
> uses savelog.
It seems
> and before anybody asks, I already but all the things into logrotate. I
> just curious why its not there from beginning.
With current default configuration, if I add some more log files
info /etc/syslog.conf (e.g. to catch localN facilities), they get rotation
automatically. Can the same be achi
* Clemens Schwaighofer [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:02:44 +0900]:
> Hi,
> I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> scripts and not logrotate.
albeit both are Priority: important, sysklogd is Section: base. and,
iiuc, base should be self-contained (that is, packages in base
Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> scripts and not logrotate.
Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it still
uses savelog.
> Because it uses its own scripts, its rather tricky to configure. Eg its
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
scripts and not logrotate.
Because it uses its own scripts, its rather tricky to configure. Eg its
impossible to have the first rotatet log (syslog.0) to be compressed.
According
12 matches
Mail list logo
