Your explanation seems fine. In the meantime, I'll try to work on
something more suitable, maybe getting build-depends as array or hash
members, I dunno. anyways, thanks for you to answer.
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 11:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:01:36AM -0400, Adrian P
Le Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:01:36AM -0400, Adrian Perez a écrit :
> There's any plan of supporting another format - without breaking
> compatibility, I mean supporting - besides the RFC one?
> I think YAML would be a good one.
Hello Adrian,
I thought about YAML for machine-readable license summar
2 matches
Mail list logo
