Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes for sure, but useless zipped information is useless
> anyway.
And you know it's useless how?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bill Allombert 2006-03-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please always keep the full Debian changelog information in the package.
> Of course, you can move very old changelog entry to changelog.old or
> changelog.1 if they cause problems, but ship them in the deb.
Please don't even do that, the changel
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:13:24PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Sunday 26 March 2006 20:18, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi,
> > what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
> > debian changelog files.
>
> Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
> befo
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:13:24PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
> before oldstable release. Based on the assumption that oldstable -> stable
> updates occur more or less over the whole stable+1 development circle.
>
> S
On Sunday 26 March 2006 20:18, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
> debian changelog files.
Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
before oldstable release. Based on the assumption that oldstable -> stable
updates
Hallo Antti,
* Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-26 20:52]:
> Nico Golde wrote:
> >I thought about changelogs like:
> >2001-04-06 mitch 20:18:29Michael Natterer
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This is not a Debian changelog, and your original question
> talked about
Nico Golde wrote:
I thought about changelogs like:
2001-04-06 mitch 20:18:29Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is not a Debian changelog, and your original question talked about
those.
Many upstreams split their own changelogs occasionally. If you like,
suggest to your
Hi,
* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-26 20:32]:
> On 10605 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
> > Is there a way to handle these changelog entries which bloat
> > the package and contain only information which are too old
> > to be useful or is it ok if for example a changelog file
On 10605 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
> what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
> debian changelog files.
Keep.
> Is there a way to handle these changelog entries which bloat
> the package and contain only information which are too old
> to be useful or is it ok if for exam
Hi,
what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
debian changelog files. I mean there are package with very
active upstream and years old changelog which grew and grew
over the years.
Is there a way to handle these changelog entries which bloat
the package and contain only informa
10 matches
Mail list logo
