Re: Virtual "fizmo" package

2014-02-10 Thread Christoph Ender
Am 08.02.2014 um 20:03 schrieb Andrei POPESCU : > On Vi, 07 feb 14, 19:22:06, Christoph Ender wrote: >> >> I’m currently thinking about creating a virtual package for "fizmo". [...] >> I'd like to drop the transitional "fizmo" package for the jessie release >> and provide a virtual package of the

Re: Virtual "fizmo" package

2014-02-08 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 07 feb 14, 19:22:06, Christoph Ender wrote: > > I’m currently thinking about creating a virtual package for "fizmo". This > was a single package in squeeze, got split up into "fizmo-ncursesw" and > "fizmo-console" in wheezy, keeping a transitional "fizmo" package in > oldlibs (which pulled

Re: Virtual "fizmo" package

2014-02-07 Thread Christoph Ender
Am 07.02.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann : > On 2014-02-07 19:22, Christoph Ender wrote: >> Section 3.6 of the policy manual mentions (via the virtual package list) >> that new virtual package names should be agreed on in debian-devel, so: > > I think your use case is covered by the > (

Re: Virtual "fizmo" package

2014-02-07 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2014-02-07 19:22, Christoph Ender wrote: > Section 3.6 of the policy manual mentions (via the virtual package list) > that new virtual package names should be agreed on in debian-devel, so: I think your use case is covered by the (except privately, amongst a cooperating group of packages) c

Virtual "fizmo" package

2014-02-07 Thread Christoph Ender
Hi all, I’m currently thinking about creating a virtual package for "fizmo". This was a single package in squeeze, got split up into "fizmo-ncursesw" and "fizmo-console" in wheezy, keeping a transitional "fizmo" package in oldlibs (which pulled in fizmo-ncursesw so far). "fizmo-sdl" is still in