Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-28 Thread Brian White
> > To do so would indicate that Slink officially supports v2.2 of the kernel, > > which it does not. > > What about a README file that says: No, Debian doesn't officially > support 2.2, but for those people who hadn't enough bandwidth but > enough courage here are the sources. I don't mind so muc

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Brian White wrote: > To do so would indicate that Slink officially supports v2.2 of the kernel, > which it does not. What about a README file that says: No, Debian doesn't officially support 2.2, but for those people who hadn't enough bandwidth but enough courage here are th

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Brian White
> > We do not officially support the 2.2 kernel in Slink. People who want to > > use 2.2 will have to compile it themselves and may have to upgrade some > > packages. > But what about shipping an extra directory support_2.2 which > contains the kernel packages and the necessary utilities together

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Jernej Zajc
Vincent Renardias wrote: > > Ok, so if we really want a Debian 2.1 that is 100% kernel 2.2.x > compatible it needs this package to be included in frozen. > I've just uploaded it in Incoming/ 10 minutes ago. > Non-developers can also access it at http://www.ldsol.com/~vincent/ > (NB: there are _2_

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Brian White wrote: > We do not officially support the 2.2 kernel in Slink. People who want to > use 2.2 will have to compile it themselves and may have to upgrade some > packages. But what about shipping an extra directory support_2.2 which contains the kernel packages and th

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Michael Stone wrote: > Quoting Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > We also need working DHCP and BOOTP support in Slink otherwise those > > people cannot use 2.2 kernels - potatos DHCP package has support for 2.2 > > (and 2.0) but I don't know about bootp. > > dhcp-beta

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Michael Stone
Quoting Mark Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 07:14:04PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > dhcp-beta has worked on 2.1* as long as I can remember. Unless you're > > talking about dhcpcd? > > I couldn't get either to work when I started using the -pre series. > However, ISTR that

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 07:14:04PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > Quoting Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > We also need working DHCP and BOOTP support in Slink otherwise those > > people cannot use 2.2 kernels - potatos DHCP package has support for 2.2 > > (and 2.0) but I don't know about b

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Brian White
> > Ok, so if we really want a Debian 2.1 that is 100% kernel 2.2.x > > compatible it needs this package to be included in frozen. > > I've just uploaded it in Incoming/ 10 minutes ago. > > Non-developers can also access it at http://www.ldsol.com/~vincent/ > > (NB: there are _2_ binary packages to

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-27 Thread Michael Stone
Quoting Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > We also need working DHCP and BOOTP support in Slink otherwise those > people cannot use 2.2 kernels - potatos DHCP package has support for 2.2 > (and 2.0) but I don't know about bootp. dhcp-beta has worked on 2.1* as long as I can remember. Unless yo

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-26 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote: > Ok, so if we really want a Debian 2.1 that is 100% kernel 2.2.x > compatible it needs this package to be included in frozen. > I've just uploaded it in Incoming/ 10 minutes ago. > Non-developers can also access it at http://www.ldsol.com/~vincent/ >

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-26 Thread Vincent Renardias
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Eric Delaunay wrote: > Vincent Renardias wrote: > [There is text before PGP section.] > > > > Ok, so if we really want a Debian 2.1 that is 100% kernel 2.2.x > > compatible it needs this package to be included in frozen. > > I've just uploaded it in Incoming/ 10 minutes ago.

Re: Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-26 Thread Eric Delaunay
Vincent Renardias wrote: [There is text before PGP section.] > > Ok, so if we really want a Debian 2.1 that is 100% kernel 2.2.x > compatible it needs this package to be included in frozen. > I've just uploaded it in Incoming/ 10 minutes ago. > Non-developers can also access it at http://www.ldsol

Uploaded util-linux 2.9g-6 (source i386) to master

1999-01-26 Thread Vincent Renardias
Ok, so if we really want a Debian 2.1 that is 100% kernel 2.2.x compatible it needs this package to be included in frozen. I've just uploaded it in Incoming/ 10 minutes ago. Non-developers can also access it at http://www.ldsol.com/~vincent/ (NB: there are _2_ binary packages to install: util-linu