On Wed, 12 May 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I doubt it, since the old ssh package is already in place, so this'll
> probably get overriden.
You have a point there... I had this:
Installing:
apache-ssl_1.3.6.4+1.32-1_m68k.deb
to dists/potato/non-US/main/binary-m68k/apache-ssl_1.3.6.4+1.32-1.deb
An
> On 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > ssh (1.2.26-4) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* make sure that ssh1 gets user suid bit set (closes: #37127)
> > Files:
> > 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc
> > 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 n
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:44:15PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc
> > 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 non-us/net optional
> > ssh_1.2.26-4.diff.gz
> > d24a8fe61a54ecace08cf6349bfd5e93 430966 non-us/net opt
On 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ssh (1.2.26-4) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* make sure that ssh1 gets user suid bit set (closes: #37127)
> Files:
> 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc
> 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 non-us/net option
4 matches
Mail list logo