Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]

2006-12-18 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:01:11PM +, Tim Cutts wrote: > I still use it on some real-world servers, but I can't now remember > why. I definitely found something which only worked with the > userland server. uid mapping, perhaps? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To

Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]

2006-12-18 Thread Tim Cutts
On 6 Nov 2006, at 9:26 am, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a écrit : I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the package will stay installed), and new installs don'

Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]

2006-11-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a écrit : > I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a > feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the package will stay > installed), and new installs don't need to get nfs-kernel-server as part > of the *de

Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf

2006-11-02 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:06:21 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hi, >> >> It has recently come to my attention that nfs-utils (which is >> priority standard) cannot depend on ucf, since ucf is of priority >> optional. >>

Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]

2006-11-02 Thread Josh Triplett
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > It has recently come to my attention that nfs-utils (which is priority > standard) cannot depend on ucf, since ucf is of priority optional. > > I can only see four solutions for this: > > a) Ignore the problem for etch, figure out what do to afterwards. > b) Downgr

Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf

2006-11-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It has recently come to my attention that nfs-utils (which is priority > > standard) cannot depend on ucf, since ucf is of priority optional. > > > > I can only see four solutions for this: > >

Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf

2006-11-02 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > It has recently come to my attention that nfs-utils (which is priority > standard) cannot depend on ucf, since ucf is of priority optional. > > I can only see four solutions for this: > > a) Ignore the problem for etch, figure out what

Upgrading the priority of ucf

2006-11-01 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Hi, It has recently come to my attention that nfs-utils (which is priority standard) cannot depend on ucf, since ucf is of priority optional. I can only see four solutions for this: a) Ignore the problem for etch, figure out what do to afterwards. b) Downgrade nfs-utils' priority (but I don't