On 13-Apr-98, 09:05 (CDT), Scott Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [re: bad symlinks for ldconfig]
>
> The messages are a symptom of not having the library and -dev package
> versions in sync. The solution is to either bring them into sync, or
> uninstall the -dev package. Either way will fix y
On Sun, 12 Apr 1998, Chris Fearnley wrote:
> 'Guy Maor wrote:'
> >
> >"LeRoy D. Cressy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> I question the purpose of leaving broken symbolic links when
> >> upgrading the libraries. For instance libreadline2 leaves
> >> the following broken links reported by ldc
'Guy Maor wrote:'
>
>"LeRoy D. Cressy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I question the purpose of leaving broken symbolic links when
>> upgrading the libraries. For instance libreadline2 leaves
>> the following broken links reported by ldconfig:
>
>Those symlinks are part of libreadline2-dev. If
Steve Greenland wrote:
>
> On 09-Apr-98, 22:04 (CDT), Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "LeRoy D. Cressy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I question the purpose of leaving broken symbolic links when
> > > upgrading the libraries. For instance libreadline2 leaves
> > > the following br
Guy Maor wrote:
>
> "LeRoy D. Cressy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I question the purpose of leaving broken symbolic links when
> > upgrading the libraries. For instance libreadline2 leaves
> > the following broken links reported by ldconfig:
>
> Those symlinks are part of libreadline2-dev
On 09-Apr-98, 22:04 (CDT), Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "LeRoy D. Cressy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I question the purpose of leaving broken symbolic links when
> > upgrading the libraries. For instance libreadline2 leaves
> > the following broken links reported by ldconfig:
>
"LeRoy D. Cressy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I question the purpose of leaving broken symbolic links when
> upgrading the libraries. For instance libreadline2 leaves
> the following broken links reported by ldconfig:
Those symlinks are part of libreadline2-dev. If you upgrade to
libreadline
Hi All,
I question the purpose of leaving broken symbolic links when
upgrading the libraries. For instance libreadline2 leaves
the following broken links reported by ldconfig:
Setting up libreadline2 (2.1-8) ...
ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libpthread.so (No such file or
directory), s
8 matches
Mail list logo