On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 19:33 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Diane,
>
> On 23-02-2023 08:12, Diane Trout wrote:
> > the version of python3-xlrd 1.2.0-3 in unstable/testing is too old
> > to
> > be used with pandas 1.5.3. (See Bug #1031701).
>
> Do I understand correctly that this isn't an issue fro
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 2:51 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 2:33 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
> > pandas has a quite extensive autopkgtest, doesn't it
> > cover this use case? Apparently you knew this earlier, why do you bring
> > this up now?
>
> Seems a bit unfortunate when pandas
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 2:33 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
> pandas has a quite extensive autopkgtest, doesn't it
> cover this use case? Apparently you knew this earlier, why do you bring
> this up now?
Seems a bit unfortunate when pandas updates the version.
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pandas
Hi Diane,
On 23-02-2023 08:12, Diane Trout wrote:
the version of python3-xlrd 1.2.0-3 in unstable/testing is too old to
be used with pandas 1.5.3. (See Bug #1031701).
Do I understand correctly that this isn't an issue from the point of
python3-xlrd and that only pandas is effected? While inve
On 2023-02-22 23:12, Diane Trout wrote:
> | visidata | none | Build-Depends |
There seems to be no versioned depends or similar in the code.
Should be safe, but in doubt ask Anja (upstream).
Cheers
Hi,
the version of python3-xlrd 1.2.0-3 in unstable/testing is too old to
be used with pandas 1.5.3. (See Bug #1031701). As it is a really common
workflow to use pandas to read excel files, it'd be nice if the version
of xlrd in bookworm was compatible.
Because of the freeze I wanted to check if
6 matches
Mail list logo
