On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> No, nothing stange about it at all. paul got rebuilt before the new
> libgtkdatabox-* was available. It either needs to be binNMUed on those
> architectures, or a new source needs to be uploaded to get it rebuilt.
Well, now I understand the trouble. New
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 09:21:39AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > that's what the m68k and sparc buildds used to build paul. The sparc and
> > m68k debs need to be updated to reflect the new library.
> But what to do that these debs will be updated? The
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Which is to say "libgtkdatabox" no longer exists, but it used to, and
Oh well, yes - I remember ;)
> that's what the m68k and sparc buildds used to build paul. The sparc and
> m68k debs need to be updated to reflect the new library.
But what to do that
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:26:20AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> # paul (- to 0.1.0.2-5)
> * paul/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkdatabox (>= 0.1.3)
> * paul/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkdatabox (>= 0.1.3)
> Moreover:
> auric:~> madison libgtkdatabox
> libgtkdatabox | 0.1.12.3-1 |
Hello
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html#paul
says:
# paul (- to 0.1.0.2-5)
* Maintainer: Andreas Tille
* 76 days old (needed 2 days)
* paul/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkdatabox (>= 0.1.3)
* paul/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkdatabox (>= 0.1.3)
5 matches
Mail list logo
