Re: Uninstallable packages testing/sarge

2003-11-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:31:59AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > If a package is uninstallable on testing, is it appropriate > to file a bug report against it, even though it might be OK > on unstable? > > If a bug report is filled, then people can become aware of the > problem, preferably before sarg

Uninstallable packages testing/sarge

2003-11-13 Thread Brian May
Hello, If a package is uninstallable on testing, is it appropriate to file a bug report against it, even though it might be OK on unstable? If a bug report is filled, then people can become aware of the problem, preferably before sarge is released.. On the other hand, it could irritate the maint

Re: Uninstallable packages & testing

2000-03-29 Thread Richard Braakman
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:20:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > tkirc (not installable on any arch, depends on ircii, which isn't in > potato or woody) ircii is now in non-us. Richard Braakman

Re: Uninstallable packages & testing

2000-03-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:20:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > There's a list of uninstallable packages for both woody and potato > (sorted by source package) linked from there too. Stats for potato at > the moment are: (number of uninstallable binary packages by arch) > * sparc:45 > *

Uninstallable packages & testing

2000-03-28 Thread Anthony Towns
Hello world, My `testing' distribution thing is back up on auric (rather than lully) now. http://auric.debian.org/~ajt/ . It's running daily or so. There's a list of uninstallable packages for both woody and potato (sorted by source package) linked from there too. Stats for potato at the moment a