Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-07 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 05/07/01 Brendan O'Dea wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:03:59AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: > >Can you compare Perl speed to Python? > >Just curious, have no prior knowledge on this. > > Can you? Of course you can. Has someone? Very probably, although I > can't recall seeing an instance off

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-06 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:03:59AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: >Can you compare Perl speed to Python? >Just curious, have no prior knowledge on this. Can you? Of course you can. Has someone? Very probably, although I can't recall seeing an instance off-hand. "Compare Perl speed to Python" is pre

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-04 Thread mdanish
I created a test program to do fibonacci series recursively in Perl, Python, Scheme, Lisp, C, and OCaML. Needless to say, OCaML kicked ass ;) But between Perl and Python, Python performed better by about 20%. On the other hand, fibonacci series is a bit of a different application than whatever ta

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-04 Thread Shaul Karl
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:00:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote: > > > > It might happen if there was a good reason, but nobody has suggested > > > > one yet. > > > > I doubt there is one. > > > > > > I have one. It's that dependency on perl makes owners of 486 machines d

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-03 Thread Jules Bean
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:00:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote: > > > It might happen if there was a good reason, but nobody has suggested one > > > yet. > > > I doubt there is one. > > > > I have one. It's that dependency on perl makes owners of 486 machines die > > of an h

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-03 Thread Adam Heath
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote: > > > It might happen if there was a good reason, but nobody has suggested one > > > yet. > > > I doubt there is one. > > > > I have one. It's that dependency on perl makes owners of 486 machines die > > of an heart-attack whenever a

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-03 Thread Joey Hess
Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote: > > It might happen if there was a good reason, but nobody has suggested one > > yet. > > I doubt there is one. > > I have one. It's that dependency on perl makes owners of 486 machines die > of an heart-attack whenever an installation task has to occur... Bollocks. Prof

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-03 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau
> It might happen if there was a good reason, but nobody has suggested one yet. > I doubt there is one. I have one. It's that dependency on perl makes owners of 486 machines die of an heart-attack whenever an installation task has to occur... Wolfgang

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-03 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 05:04:12PM -0700, David Whedon wrote: > debconf. There has been discussion of making perl not required, but it > remains > to be seen if that will happen. It might happen if there was a good reason, but nobody has suggested one yet. I doubt there is one. Hamish -- Hami

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-02 Thread John Galt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2 May 2001, Joey Hess wrote: >Simon Richter wrote: >> I'm currently debconfizing one of my packages, uptimed. Two quoestions >> have arised: > >That's "debconfiscated"[1]. No, that's what lilo did to install-mbr... - -- Sacred cows make th

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-02 Thread Joey Hess
Simon Richter wrote: > I'm currently debconfizing one of my packages, uptimed. Two quoestions > have arised: That's "debconfiscated"[1]. > - At the start of my config script, I import all settings from the real > configuration file, if it exists. For some settings, this is trivial, > for

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, 1 May 2001, David Whedon wrote: >... > In that case it would be that fact that perl-base is 'priority required' that > allows you to avoid a dependancy on perl rather than the fact that you are > using >... It's not the 'priority required' but the "Essential: yes" of perl-base that makes

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-01 Thread David Whedon
> > for some, I need rather complex text processing. Since perl isn't > > essential, writing the script in perl would make the package depend on > > perl while this is unnecessary for normal operation. Would this be > > acceptable or should I find a better solution? > > > > If you

RE: Two debconf issues

2001-05-01 Thread Simon Richter
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > If you use debconf you are using perl (-: of course awk is your friend and > mine. Hrm, since that stuff will also tend to get ugly when written in awk, I think I'm going to use perl then. Simon -- GPG public key available from http://phobos

RE: Two debconf issues

2001-05-01 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 01-May-2001 Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently debconfizing one of my packages, uptimed. Two quoestions > have arised: > > - At the start of my config script, I import all settings from the real > configuration file, if it exists. For some settings, this is trivial, > for s

Two debconf issues

2001-05-01 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, I'm currently debconfizing one of my packages, uptimed. Two quoestions have arised: - At the start of my config script, I import all settings from the real configuration file, if it exists. For some settings, this is trivial, for some, I need rather complex text processing. Since per