* Helmut Grohne , 2016-02-03, 06:17:
I see that there is now a lintian check for this issue whcih is great,
and gives us some idea of how big it is:
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html
So that lists 240 packages which are MA:same and also contain an
arch
Hi Wookey,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:49:07AM +, Wookey wrote:
> I see that there is now a lintian check for this issue whcih is great,
> and gives us some idea of how big it is:
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html
>
> So that lists 240 packages which
+++ Helmut Grohne [2016-01-31 20:13 +0100]:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 04:51:26PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Thanks for doing this.
> >
> > How frequently will these be updated? It would be nice for people to be
> > able to upload fixes and see the effects.
>
> Thus far, these
+++ Johannes Schauer [2016-01-31 15:27 +0100]:
> Quoting Stephen Kitt (2016-01-31 11:49:32)
> > For example, hhvm can't be cross-compiled because it
> > build-depends, directly and indirectly (via imagemagick), on
> > libfreetype6-dev
> > (which contains /usr/bin/freetype-config and is therefore n
+++ Helmut Grohne [2016-02-02 20:40 +0100]:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:39:50AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > I see these haven't entered testing because:
> >
> > * 183 days old (needed 5 days)
> > * crossbuild-essential-arm64/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6-dev:arm64
> > * crossbuild-essent
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 23:07 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> My question is: why does it not just use dose3 just as the buildds
> are doing it?
How old is the dose codebase? The changelog.gz in the current Debian
package only goes back to 2012, which is more than a decade after
britney was origin
Hi,
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2016-02-02 20:40:38)
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:39:50AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > I see these haven't entered testing because:
> >
> > * 183 days old (needed 5 days)
> > * crossbuild-essential-arm64/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6-dev:arm64
> > * crossbuild-e
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:39:50AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I see these haven't entered testing because:
>
> * 183 days old (needed 5 days)
> * crossbuild-essential-arm64/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6-dev:arm64
> * crossbuild-essential-armel/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6-dev:armel
>
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:08:09PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> We have cross compilers and crossbuild-essential-* packages in unstable
> for quite a while now. (Thanks to Matthias Klose.)
I see these haven't entered testing because:
* 183 days old (needed 5 days)
* crossbuild-essential-arm64
On 30.01.2016 20:08, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Cross building the Debian archive
-
Debian unstable has about 22000 source packages. Out of those, about 5000
source packages can satisfy their Build-Depends in a cross build
setting. For failing packages, detailed diagnos
Hi Colin,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 04:51:26PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> How frequently will these be updated? It would be nice for people to be
> able to upload fixes and see the effects.
Thus far, these are one-shot rebuilds. It is the second attempt of mine.
I cro
Hi Timo,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 05:18:22PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> make just defaults CC to cc so setting CC in the surrounding environment
> works
> as intended, even without a Makefile. Just try: "CC=clang make foo" with a
> foo.c in the directory.
I stand corrected about this simp
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:08:09PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Out of those 5000 source packages, I selected 3000 popular (as in
> popcon) source packages and built them using debomatic (build arch =
> amd64, host arch = ppc64el). (Thanks to Luca Falavigna.) About 1000
> builds were successful (w
Hi Helmut,
2016-01-31 15:58:17 Helmut Grohne:
> Unfortunately, for Makefile based build systems we cannot simply pass CC
> to the build. Exporting it as an environment variable, will not help
> much as make defines CC as a builtin variable, which overrides the
> environment. In the vast majority o
* Johannes Schauer , 2016-01-31, 15:27:
libmagickcore-dev is multiarch:foreign
This is surely a bug.
libmagickcore-dev is a transitional package for libmagickcore-6.q16-dev,
which is MA:same, so its interfaces are very much architecture
dependent.
--
Jakub Wilk
Hi Timo,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:24:29PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> The build log has an interesting line:
> > dpkg-architecture: warning: specified GNU system type powerpc64le-linux-gnu
> > does not match CC system type x86_64-linux-gnu, try setting a correct CC
> > environment variabl
Hi Stephen and Bastien,
Quoting Stephen Kitt (2016-01-31 11:49:32)
> I'll give it a shot... (And add this later to the wiki.)
which page will you be editing?
> As I understand it, the page lists *dependency* problems which prevent:
It is indeed important to stress that these are only dependency
Hi Johannes, hi Bastien,
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 01:53:34 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2016-01-31 00:49:14)
> > Could you document on wiki how can we begin as a package manager. For
> > instance I could not achieve to parse
> > http://bootstrap.debian.net/cross_all/imag
Hi,
2016-01-30 20:08:09 Helmut Grohne:
> Let me give a status update on how well cross building works in
> unstable.
> Processing the logs
> ---
>
> I've hacked up a script that guesses failure reasons by scanning the
> logs with some regular expressions. Common issues are:
>
>
Hi,
Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2016-01-31 00:49:14)
> Could you document on wiki how can we begin as a package manager. For
> instance I could not achieve to parse
> http://bootstrap.debian.net/cross_all/imagemagick.html
I apologize. Since I wrote the software it is hard for me to put myself into
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let me give a status update on how well cross building works in
> unstable.
>
> Toolchain
> -
>
> We have cross compilers and crossbuild-essential-* packages in unstable
> for quite a while now. (Thanks to Matthias Klose.) The
Hi,
Let me give a status update on how well cross building works in
unstable.
Toolchain
-
We have cross compilers and crossbuild-essential-* packages in unstable
for quite a while now. (Thanks to Matthias Klose.) These tend to work
well. Recently, sbuild saw significant improvements wrt.
22 matches
Mail list logo
