On Wed, 09 Feb 2011, John Goerzen wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 05:04 PM, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >Similar AX.25 tools "call" and "listen" were renamed in 2007 to ax*
> >(package ax25-apps), because those names were too generic (according to
> >the changelog).
>
> ... resulting in considerable confusion
On 02/08/2011 05:04 PM, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Similar AX.25 tools "call" and "listen" were renamed in 2007 to ax*
(package ax25-apps), because those names were too generic (according to
the changelog).
... resulting in considerable confusion from many people, given that
much documentation out
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:54:24AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > The LinuxNode project
> > -
> > The other is a frontend to libax25, an AX.25 implementation for Linux.
> > Hardware implementations of AX.25 are apparen
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: The "node" command in Debian"):
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 at 04:46:57 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Problem: scripts may use the 'node' name to refer to either of these
> > programs. Which should get the name? You decide
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 at 04:46:57 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Problem: scripts may use the 'node' name to refer to either of these
> programs. Which should get the name? You decide, based not on
> popularity or priority but --- well, based on whatever makes sense.
Perhaps rename both, also pro
On 12384 March 1977, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 5. nodejs package provides /usr/bin/nodejs, following policy.
>nodejs-notrenamed package links /usr/bin/node to nodejs, and conflicts
>with node package.
And end up with two exactly identical binary packages (except for the
filename) in the archive?
* Jérémy Lal [110207 18:21]:
> > 2. they can be forced (by the TC) to drop their claim of "node" in the
> >common namespace. This is not likely to happen.
If both camps can rightly argue that some other command called
"node" might make things in their camp call the wrong thing, then this
is
On 07/02/2011 13:54, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
>system will never let both get installed in the same system.
>
>Unless both communities have a large overlap, this one makes both
>happy, until a third packa
brian m. carlson writes ("Re: The "node" command in Debian"):
> The definition of "filename" here is unclear. AX.25's node is in
> /usr/sbin (IIRC) and nodejs's is in /usr/bin. This, of course, poses
> practical problems for people that have bo
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:43:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: The "node" command in Debian"):
> > 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
> >system will never let both get installed i
On 07/02/2011 16:43, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011 13.54:24 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
>>system will never let both get installed in the same system.
>
> JavaScript and AX.25 sounds like it
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: The "node" command in Debian"):
> 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
>system will never let both get installed in the same system.
No, this is explicitly forbidden by policy and quite
On Monday 07 February 2011 13.54:24 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
>system will never let both get installed in the same system.
JavaScript and AX.25 sounds like it might be quite a distance in terms of
people involve
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> As you may know[0], there are currently two packages in Debian
> experimental providing a "node" binary.
>
> [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/08/msg00568.html
...
> One is from the node.js project. It was renamed from "server" to
> "nod
Jonathan Nieder writes ("The "node" command in Debian"):
> (please follow-up to debian-devel only)
> If no consensus emerges, policy §10.1 in its Solomon-like wisdom says
> _both_ commands must be renamed. I hope we can do better. I will be
> happy to file re
(please follow-up to debian-devel only)
Hi Debianites,
As you may know[0], there are currently two packages in Debian
experimental providing a "node" binary.
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/08/msg00568.html
The node.js project
---
One is from the node.js project. I
16 matches
Mail list logo
