Re: Testing Large File Support (LFS)

2004-10-18 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Anand Kumria [Tue, Oct 19 2004, 12:53:45AM]: > I'm just wondering if there is an automated way that we can test programs > and/or packages to determine if they have working large file support? I do not think this can be automated easily. Every program has a different way of working wi

Re: Testing Large File Support (LFS)

2004-10-18 Thread Steve McIntyre
Anand Kumria writes: > >I'm just wondering if there is an automated way that we can test programs >and/or packages to determine if they have working large file support? > >I've stumbled onto problems in this area, in the past, with Apache and >Apache2 (fixed upstream but won't be making sarge) and

Re: Testing Large File Support (LFS)

2004-10-18 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Anand Kumria] > I'm hoping there is some automated tool we can use rather than > having to find and then report bugs as we go. Perhaps you can use 'nm binary' and check if it is using the 64-bit version of the libc function calls?

Testing Large File Support (LFS)

2004-10-18 Thread Anand Kumria
Hi, I'm just wondering if there is an automated way that we can test programs and/or packages to determine if they have working large file support? I've stumbled onto problems in this area, in the past, with Apache and Apache2 (fixed upstream but won't be making sarge) and with things like wget