Re: Switch to DEP-14-ish with an existing "debian" branch

2019-02-04 Thread Xavier
Le 04/02/2019 à 14:33, Andreas Ronnquist a écrit : > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:07:22 +0200, > Peter Pentchev wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to be a Good >> Thing(tm) and I started thinking about switching my packages' Git >> repositories to this layout. Ho

Re: Switch to DEP-14-ish with an existing "debian" branch

2019-02-04 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 14:38, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 14:07, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to be a Good > > > Thing(tm) and I started thinking

Re: Switch to DEP-14-ish with an existing "debian" branch

2019-02-04 Thread Paride Legovini
Hi Peter, Peter Pentchev wrote on 04/02/2019: > So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to be a Good > Thing(tm) and I started thinking about switching my packages' Git > repositories to this layout. However, I immediately hit a snag: > in some of my repositories the upstream branch

Re: Switch to DEP-14-ish with an existing "debian" branch

2019-02-04 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:07:22 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: >Hi, > >So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to be a Good >Thing(tm) and I started thinking about switching my packages' Git >repositories to this layout. However, I immediately hit a snag: >in some of my repositories the u

Re: Switch to DEP-14-ish with an existing "debian" branch

2019-02-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:38:35PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 14:07, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to be a Good > > > Thing(tm) and I start

Re: Switch to DEP-14-ish with an existing "debian" branch

2019-02-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 14:07, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to be a Good > > Thing(tm) and I started thinking about switching my packages' Git > > repositories to this layout

Switch to DEP-14-ish with an existing "debian" branch

2019-02-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
Hi, So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to be a Good Thing(tm) and I started thinking about switching my packages' Git repositories to this layout. However, I immediately hit a snag: in some of my repositories the upstream branch is named "master" and the Debian packaging branch