On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:21:30 -0500, "Vince Mulhollon"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>References? Just curious what the huge problems are. It fundamentally
>seems to work, or at least I've not yet run into any road blocks.
- symlinks
- file owners
- file modes
These three are show stoppers for the m
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:36, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:31:14PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > Actually, one good solution is turning on the Nagle algorithm, or
> > > rather not using TCP_NODELAY (I don't know if ssh sets it, but I guess
> > > it does to improve responsiveness
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:31:14PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Actually, one good solution is turning on the Nagle algorithm, or rather
> > not using TCP_NODELAY (I don't know if ssh sets it, but I guess it does to
> > improve responsiveness). What you propose will break situations where you
>
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 12:11, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Ideally we could have a terminal type that ALLOWS THE SERVER TO SAY
> > "local echo all characters, buffer them and flush the buffer on '\n',
> > '\t', (and ANY OTHER INTERESTING CHARA
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:18:35 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> I'm a student at Kent University Canterbury UK I will be
starting
> my final year project some time next
> year and I am looking to find a project that involves linux development
> ideally kernel / module based or a port
>
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:11:58PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Actually, one good solution is turning on the Nagle algorithm, or rather not
> using TCP_NODELAY (I don't know if ssh sets it, but I guess it does to improve
> responsiveness). What you propose will break situations where you have to t
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> Ideally we could have a terminal type that allows the server to say "local
> echo all characters, buffer them and flush the buffer on '\n', '\t', (and any
> other interesting characters)". That would allow the above command to be
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm a student at Kent University Canterbury UK I will be starting
> my final year project some time next
> year and I am looking to find a project that involves linux development
> ideally kernel / module based or a port
> of software to
> I'm a student [...] and I am looking to find a project that
> involves linux development ideally kernel / module based or a port
> of software to a specific platform.
if you're interested in newtork-oriented things, I'm developing here
a test suite to torture-test IP routers. it has s
> Add versioning to debian packet management. Something like:
>
># apt-get install package
># # damn it broke my server again!!
># apt-get rewind package
IIRC, you can do
# apt-get install package=3.2.0-3
or alternatively
# apt-get install package/{stable,unstable,testing}
Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[subversion]
> It looks like a candidate to be packaged as well.
Maybe not yet, though ISTR there's a Debian Developer who follows
subversion. Right now, its under extreme development and just started
self-hosting, so people interested in it probably wa
On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 14:56:23 -0400
"Alan Shutko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I hate CVS, i thought everyone else did as well and people only used
it
> > because of a lack of alternatives.
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org
>
Yes, interesting, i ha
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I hate CVS, i thought everyone else did as well and people only used it
> > because of a lack of alternatives.
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org
OT: galeon does not like this website muc
Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I hate CVS, i thought everyone else did as well and people only used it
> because of a lack of alternatives.
http://subversion.tigris.org
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Silverman's Law: If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it w
On 09/07/2001 09:21:27 PM Glenn McGrath wrote:
>> The command line arguments CVS use are truely original, which is a
really
>> really bad thing !
>>
>> :pserver:, :ext: mixed with environment variables crazy... what were
>> they thinking when they came up with that stuff, not simplicity thats
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:21:30 -0500
"Vince Mulhollon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 09/07/2001 11:20:42 AM Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> >> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:13:50AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> >> > Integrating CVS into Debian (as a core component, not just a
package)
> would
> >> >
Vince Mulhollon (2001-09-07 12:21:30 -0500) :
> On 09/07/2001 11:20:42 AM Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
>>> But futile and misguided. CVS has whole swathes of fundamental flaws,
>>> largely historical. Better to integrate with something similar to CVS
>
> References? Just curious what the huge problem
On 09/07/2001 11:20:42 AM Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:13:50AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
>> > Integrating CVS into Debian (as a core component, not just a package)
would
>> > be a long, complex, and rewarding project.
>>
>> But futile and misguided. CVS has whole swath
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:13:50AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> Integrating CVS into Debian (as a core component, not just a package) would
> be a long, complex, and rewarding project.
But futile and misguided. CVS has whole swathes of fundamental flaws,
largely historical. Better to integrate
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 04:45:35PM +0200, "T.Pospisek's MailLists" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> # apt-get install package
> # # damn it broke my server again!!
> # apt-get rewind package
Aside from the fact that the specific packages may not handle this
gracefully, and that you may n
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:13:50AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
>
> On 09/07/2001 09:45:35 AM "T.Pospisek's MailLists" wrote:
>
> >> Add versioning to debian packet management. Something like:
> >>
> >> # apt-get install package
> >> # # damn it broke my server again!!
> >> # apt-get rewind pack
On 09/07/2001 09:45:35 AM "T.Pospisek's MailLists" wrote:
>> Add versioning to debian packet management. Something like:
>>
>> # apt-get install package
>> # # damn it broke my server again!!
>> # apt-get rewind package
I'd prefer something "like CVS" so I could roll back to milestones or back
t
Add versioning to debian packet management. Something like:
# apt-get install package
# # damn it broke my server again!!
# apt-get rewind package
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 03:18:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> I'm a student at Kent University Canterbury UK I will be starting
> my final year project some time next
> year and I am looking to find a project that involves linux development
> ideally kernel / module based or a
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 03:18:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> I'm a student at Kent University Canterbury UK I will be starting
> my final year project some time next
> year and I am looking to find a project that involves linux development
> ideally kernel / module based or a
Hi
I'm a student at Kent University Canterbury UK I will be starting my final year project some time next
year and I am looking to find a project that involves linux development ideally kernel / module based or a port
of software to a specific platform. I am unsure as to what projects are
26 matches
Mail list logo
