Hi,
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 06:27:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > Sean Whitton writes:
>
> >> 2. Do we need to include any text saying *why* the /etc/default practice
> >>is a bad idea? I couldn't come up with a succinct way to state it.
> >>In general, I think
Ian Jackson writes:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>> 2. Do we need to include any text saying *why* the /etc/default practice
>>is a bad idea? I couldn't come up with a succinct way to state it.
>>In general, I think we can err on the side of not including the text,
>>since we have policy b
Felipe Sateler writes ("Re: Bug#857452: Steps towards a patch to document
disabling a daemon upon installation"):
> I have a branch that does some refactoring to update-rc.d and adds the
> new command[1]
>
> Review welcome.
>
> [1]
> https://anonscm.debian.or
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Felipe Sateler writes ("Re: Steps towards a patch to document disabling a
> daemon upon installation"):
>> I suggest instead mentioning the real reasons its bad:
>
> Thanks for providing real reasons.
>
>>
control: block 601455 by 857452
On Mon, Sep 11 2017, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This should also be fixed with a new update-rc.d rune.
Thank you, Ian and Felipe, for your feedback.
I think the right thing is to wait on #857452.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Felipe Sateler writes ("Re: Steps towards a patch to document disabling a
daemon upon installation"):
> I suggest instead mentioning the real reasons its bad:
Thanks for providing real reasons.
> > I can't speak to the behaviour of systemd, but I think the
> &
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:41:12 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Steps towards a patch to document disabling a
> daemon upon installation"):
> ...
>> [draft policy text]
> ...
>> > +The default behaviour is to enable autostarting your packa
Sean Whitton writes ("Steps towards a patch to document disabling a daemon upon
installation"):
...
> [draft policy text]
...
> > +The default behaviour is to enable autostarting your package's daemon.
> > +If the daemon should not be autostarted unless the local adm
On Sep 09, Sean Whitton wrote:
> 1. Is the 'should not' for the /etc/default practice too strong? I
No, because it cannot be supported in a sane way by systemd units.
It should even be "must not".
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Sean Whitton,
Thanks for your work on this. Hopefully you'll find something in my
comments inlined below of any use...
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 01:40:18PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is what I have so far; it is certainly inadequate. CCing -devel
> for help answering my te
Hello,
This is what I have so far; it is certainly inadequate. CCing -devel
for help answering my technical questions about this patch.
> @@ -537,6 +537,21 @@ and in your ``postrm``
> update-rc.d package remove
> fi
>
> +The default behaviour is to enable autostarting your packag
11 matches
Mail list logo
