On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:26:13PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> > Hello Roland, I know nothing about fpc, but does it really need to
> > produce binaries statically linked with glibc ? I would expect to just
> > link statically with the units and dynamically with glibc. This would
>
Hi Bill,
> Hello Roland, I know nothing about fpc, but does it really need to
> produce binaries statically linked with glibc ? I would expect to just
> link statically with the units and dynamically with glibc. This would
> be much less a problem. (In particular, if security bugs are found in
>
* Roland Stigge:
> Unfortunately, fpc in Debian produces statically linked binaries, due to
> the Pascal unit style library files. We currently don't have other
> packages in the archive that Build-Depend on fp-compiler (except fpc
> itself which indeed carries statically linked binaries) as examp
Hi,
maintaining m-tx, I would like to move from the p2c generated C sources
to the original upstream Pascal sources (better suited for patches,
development, design, etc.).
m-tx is written in a Turbo Pascal dialect that can only be compiled with
fpc (not gpc).
Unfortunately, fpc in Debian produce
4 matches
Mail list logo