Re: State of the slimserver package.

2007-03-06 Thread Simon Kelley
Steve Greenland wrote: On 05-Mar-07, 15:12 (CST), Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The packages are not DFSG-compliant: they contain the whole of the software, with nothing removed, but the non-free stuff (missing in the official .debs) is not re-distributable. None of which is a prob

Re: State of the slimserver package.

2007-03-06 Thread Steve Greenland
On 05-Mar-07, 15:12 (CST), Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The packages are not DFSG-compliant: they contain the whole of the > software, with nothing removed, but the non-free stuff (missing in the > official .debs) is not re-distributable. None of which is a problem for the copyright h

State of the slimserver package.

2007-03-05 Thread Simon Kelley
I'm in a quandary about the future of the slimserver package. There's a problem with upstream: it contains a significant amount of non-free stuff, which had to be ripped out of the software before it went into Debian. This means that the Debian package is missing some functionality, and that t