On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:56:07 -0400
> Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We might not want to use policy-rc.d as is in sysvinit of filerc
> > during startup but we might consider moving these policy decisions
> > "no I d
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:56:07 -0400
Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We might not want to use policy-rc.d as is in sysvinit of filerc
> during startup but we might consider moving these policy decisions
> "no I don't want this daemon at startup, yes I want that daemon
> reloaded after res
[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]
> sysv-init's way to do what you want is to move the links from S to
> K. That's about the beggining and end of the issue. If insserv is
> breaking this, it means you have a missing (important) feature in
> insserv that needs fixing. But that doesn't have anything
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> > The DESIGN behind invoke-rc.d and policy-rc.d is to help MAINTAINER SCRIPTS
> > don't screw up when restarting/starting/stopping services automatically,
> > either in the normal system context, or inside special chroots.
> >
> > They are NOT, and I rep
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:02:39AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Why don't we let sysv-init (at least optionally) use policy-rc.d?
>
> Because that would make policy-rc.d and invoke-rc.d useless crap.
>
> The DESIGN behind invoke-rc.d an
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> Why don't we let sysv-init (at least optionally) use policy-rc.d?
Because that would make policy-rc.d and invoke-rc.d useless crap.
The DESIGN behind invoke-rc.d and policy-rc.d is to help MAINTAINER SCRIPTS
don't screw up when restarting/starting/stopp
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:58:26PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> > I haven't investigated it, but I wonder if it isn't the sane way to have
> > complex dependency (à la LSB) stored in one place, and system admin
> > preference in another pl
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:21:44 +0800
Lightning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you should use the rcconf to disable the services
>
> apt-get install rcconf
But that surely isn't the standard way, 'cause otherwise the package
wouldn't be priority optional.
Thanks for all the suggestions, I know that
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:24:46 +0200
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:42:35 +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >There is also the option to install file-rc and just edit
> >/etc/runlevel.conf with an editor if you don't want to cope
> >with the symlink hel
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:42:35 +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There is also the option to install file-rc and just edit
>/etc/runlevel.conf with an editor if you don't want to cope
>with the symlink hell.
That's how I have been doing things for years, but that's going to be
incompat
On 28-Jul-08, 20:58 (CDT), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Well, policy-rc.d is obeyed by invoke-rc.d, and therefore, by all maintainer
> scripts.
>
> But manually trying to run the initscript will still work.
Which is a *good* thing, which is why I detest the growing h
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> I haven't investigated it, but I wonder if it isn't the sane way to have
> complex dependency (à la LSB) stored in one place, and system admin
> preference in another place.
Well, policy-rc.d is obeyed by invoke-rc.d, and therefore, by all maintainer
sc
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 10:40 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > >> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 a 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a ecrit
:
> > >>>
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 01:21:45PM +0200, Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:27:27 +0200
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > >> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Br
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:27:27 +0200
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
> >>> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/i
you should use the rcconf to disable the services
apt-get install rcconf
在 2008-07-26六的 13:18 +0200，Harald Braumann写道：
> Hi,
>
> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
> doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
>
> Many services have a file in /etc/defaults,
* Harald Braumann:
> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
> doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
I usually put "exit 0" near the top of the init script. The symlink
stuff is far too brittle.
I haven't tried Nico's suggestion to use file-rc; if it works
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
> >>> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But the
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
>>> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
>>> doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
>
>> The stan
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
> > quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
> > doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
> The standard way is to remove the sy
Hi Hans,
* Hans-J. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-26 17:17]:
> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2008 schrieb Harald Braumann:
[...]
> > sysv-rc-conf would be one option, in which case it would have to have
> > priority required. The other option being removing the executable bit.
> > I would be content
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2008 schrieb Harald Braumann:
> Hi,
>
> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
> doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
>
> Many services have a file in /etc/defaults, where the service can be
> disabled. In that case, however, the service
Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
> doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
The standard way is to remove the symlinks in /etc/rc?.d
> In http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:18:54PM +0200, Harald Braumann wrote:
> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
> doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
[...]
Here's what I found last time I looked into it:
http://www.enricozini.org/2008/tips/dont-start-mysql-by-
Hi,
quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
Many services have a file in /etc/defaults, where the service can be
disabled. In that case, however, the service also can't be started
manually.
In http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
25 matches
Mail list logo
