Miles Bader writes:
> I think in many cases, the issue is not really an "incompetent" legal
> department per se, but a culture of risk-avoidance combined with a legal
> department that doesn't really gain much either way and incompetent
> high-level management (in the sense that they don't spend
David Weinehall writes:
>> Consider the case where a legal department was worried about the code
>> repository becoming "tainted" with uncontrolled or ill-considered GPL
>> obligations.
>
> If the legal department is that incompetent it's about time they got
> replaced by more competent people...
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:55:19AM +1000, Peter Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 19:39 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > So, I'm curious here: why would you need a non-copyleft license for a
> > *test suite*?
>
> Consider the case where a legal department was worried about the code
> reposit
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 19:39 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> So, I'm curious here: why would you need a non-copyleft license for a
> *test suite*?
Consider the case where a legal department was worried about the code
repository becoming "tainted" with uncontrolled or ill-considered GPL
obligations
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 08:02:32PM +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
> an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
> e.g. BSD or MIT, which is why I can't just use the tests in the glibc
> sou
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 05:19:02 PM John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
wrote:
> While cygwin may have a "suite" they are a private company I wouldn't bet to
> dl and use it without a lawyer reading any "corporate provided license"
> they've wrote, my personal preference that is.
Newlib is f
Oh sorry. I saw BSD MIT not glibc. And I've never heard a complaint about GPL. Kernigan / Ritche
wrote C I can't think you'd ever erase that however :) Pascal might be more!
While cygwin may have a "suite" they are a private company I wouldn't bet to dl and use it without a
lawyer reading a
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 16:24 +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 20:02 +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> > I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
> > an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
> > e.g. BSD or MIT, which is why I ca
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 20:02 +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
> an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
> e.g. BSD or MIT, which is why I can't just use the tests in the glibc
> sources.
newlib, used by
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:17 PM, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell <
johnandsa...@cox.net> wrote:
> I thought on Gnu site if you get and compile the compiler it already has a
> test suite, for C anyway (i have not tried it personally).
>
He mentions in the message that he's looking for
Hi I'm not a DD but ...
I thought on Gnu site if you get and compile the compiler it already has a test suite, for C anyway
(i have not tried it personally).
Peter Miller wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
an open source one, preferably
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
e.g. BSD or MIT, which is why I can't just use the tests in the glibc
sources.
Can anyone suggest projects that I should look at?
--
Regards
Pet
12 matches
Mail list logo
