Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-04 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Donnerstag, den 04.04.2013, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Bechtold: > On 04/01/2013 03:11 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > We had a move of not ubuntu-specific script from ubuntu-dev-tools 0.124 > > to devscripts 2.11.0 two years ago. These scripts were add-patch, > > edit-patch, suspicious-source, wh

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-04 Thread Thomas Bechtold
On 04/01/2013 03:11 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > We had a move of not ubuntu-specific script from ubuntu-dev-tools 0.124 > to devscripts 2.11.0 two years ago. These scripts were add-patch, > edit-patch, suspicious-source, what-patch, and wrap-and-sort. Maybe it's > time to do it again. > > We have

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 2 April 2013 16:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> >> Apparently there are, but aside from that: should a 'bts' command on >> $DERIVATIVE interact with the Debian bug-tracking system, or the >> $DERIVATIVE bug-tracking system? > > This can/sho

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-02 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > My point. Sorry Ben! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130402204348.GC5048@debian

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 04:58:20PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:18:53PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > This can/should preferably be configurable, defaulting to the Debian > > BTS. Derivatives should be encouraged to override the defaults > > accordingly. > > In

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > This can/should preferably be configurable, defaulting to the Debian > BTS. Derivatives should be encouraged to override the defaults > accordingly. Only EmDebian is using debbugs and they use bugs.d.o. I didn't think the bts command had

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-02 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:18:53PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > This can/should preferably be configurable, defaulting to the Debian > BTS. Derivatives should be encouraged to override the defaults > accordingly. In the case of "our" bts tool, I think it would be rather too much work to re-arc

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-02 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Apparently there are, but aside from that: should a 'bts' command on > $DERIVATIVE interact with the Debian bug-tracking system, or the > $DERIVATIVE bug-tracking system? This can/should preferably be configurable, defaulting to the Debian

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 14:41 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 00:13 + schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 22:49 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package > > > maintainer eas

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-01 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 14:41:53 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 00:13 + schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > There is no reason why Debian couldn't continue to be upstream for > > these, but hosting on freedesktop.org might make them more visible to > > other distributions. > >

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-01 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 00:13 + schrieb Ben Hutchings: >> On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 22:49 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package >> > maintainer easier. Not

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 12:12 -0400 schrieb Michael Gilbert: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wookey wrote: > > +++ Benjamin Drung [2013-03-30 22:49 +0100]: > >> Hi, > >> > >> devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package > >> maintainer easier. Not every script in

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 09:24 +0100 schrieb Lars Wirzenius: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > I like to keep only Debian packaging specific scripts in devscripts (see > > the list below). Where should we put the non Debian packaging specific > > scripts? Shou

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-04-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 00:13 + schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 22:49 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Hi, > > > > devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package > > maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging > > specific. Some

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-03-31 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wookey wrote: > > +++ Benjamin Drung [2013-03-30 22:49 +0100]: > > Hi, > > > > devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package > > maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging > > specific. Some of them are used on othe

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-03-31 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wookey wrote: > +++ Benjamin Drung [2013-03-30 22:49 +0100]: >> Hi, >> >> devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package >> maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging >> specific. Some of them are used on other non-De

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-03-31 Thread Wookey
+++ Benjamin Drung [2013-03-30 22:49 +0100]: > Hi, > > devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package > maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging > specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based distributions. Whilst considering what scr

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-03-31 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > I like to keep only Debian packaging specific scripts in devscripts (see > the list below). Where should we put the non Debian packaging specific > scripts? Should we create a neutral project or are there other projects > in which th

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-03-31 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package > maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging > specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based distributions. > I was contacted

Re: Splitting the devscripts package

2013-03-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 22:49 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Hi, > > devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package > maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging > specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based distributions. > I was contacte

Splitting the devscripts package

2013-03-30 Thread Benjamin Drung
Hi, devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based distributions. I was contacted [1] and asked if we could split the Debian packaging specific scrip