Le jeudi 09 avril 2009 à 14:24 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Apparently, developers have a strong tendency to not fix these bugs the
> > correct way and instead, to make packages depend on e.g.
> > python-gtkmozembed | py
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Apparently, developers have a strong tendency to not fix these bugs the
> correct way and instead, to make packages depend on e.g.
> python-gtkmozembed | python-gnome2-extras
>
Could you expand on this point?
The question has ju
Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 14:08 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> 3. GNOME-PYTHON-EXTRAS
>
> What is happening in unstable:
> * egg.trayicon, gtkhtml2 and gtkmozembed each have their own
> binary package (python-eggtrayicon, python-gtkhtml2,
> python-gtkmozembed)
> * gk
Hi Joss,
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> 1. GNOME-PYTHON
> I propose to file wishlist bugs on the packages that can move to using
> python-gconf.
> 2. GNOME-PYTHON-DESKTOP
> I propose to file important bugs on all packages depending on
> python-gnome2-desktop, making them RC once the package is remo
> Clement Lorteau
>gtkvncviewer
I filed #518000 a while ago about this, heh. But the bug report needs
updating to say that python-gconf exists on its own, and that
gtkvncviewer should depend on that instead of python-gnome2.
Cheers,
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory a
Hi,
the gnome-python, gnome-python-desktop and gnome-python-extras packages
are collections of Python modules that are not necessarily related. It
was more and more requested to split them more logically, and this is
what I have done now that upstream plans are a bit clearer.
According to the cha
6 matches
Mail list logo
