Re: Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)

1999-10-06 Thread Tom Pfeifer
> But if we create _debian-user-unstable_, the _debian-user_ readers > would miss (would they care?) the discussions -- some of them > interesting -- about changes, and might therefore be less well > prepared to handle the upgrade to potato when it becomes stable. > > So I obviously can't make up

Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)

1999-10-06 Thread David Coe
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "A. M. Varon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Could we have a potato mailing lists? > > That's part of what debian-devel *is* for. Why would we want another > list for it? Ben answered on _debian-devel_, but not on _debian-user_; I hope he doesn't min