On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > I concur and I'll be happy to approve such usage of Debian money.
> > FWIW, what is needed to make this kind of things happen is not
> > really money. What is missing is rather a bit of coordination of
> > people that: 1) keep track of what hardware
]] Tollef Fog Heen
| The ones you mentioned on IRC were sparc and powerpc. PowerPC is
| getting an extra debian.net porterbox as we speak, this one being a quad
| 2.5GHz G5 with 6G memory and 500G disk. (It'll run a buildbot for
| Varnish so it won't be a DSA machine.)
The machine is now live
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:44:08 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> The ones you mentioned on IRC were sparc and powerpc. PowerPC is
> getting an extra debian.net porterbox as we speak, this one being a quad
> 2.5GHz G5 with 6G memory and 500G disk. (It'll run a buildbot for
> Varnish so it won't be a
]] Mike Hommey
| Speaking of which. It would also totally be an appropriate use of Debian
| money to get new porter boxes that fit the buildds. Most of the non x86
| porter boxes are pathetically slow, which is even sadder when you know
| the buildd boxes for the same architectures are an order o
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > What is missing is rather a bit of coordination of people that:
> [..]
> > Any taker?
>
> Well, according to [1] and [2], we have some hardware donations
> coordinators, and at [3] we have a list of needed hardware.
>
Hi!
Am 21.08.2011 18:59, schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
[ more powerful hardware needed ]
> What is missing is rather a bit of coordination of people that:
[..]
> Any taker?
Well, according to [1] and [2], we have some hardware donations
coordinators, and at [3] we have a list of needed hardware.
Hi,
On Sat Aug 20, 2011 at 20:45:18 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:19:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 11/08/11 at 19:52 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > On 2011-08-11, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > >> Think of both user systems and the Debian buildds which will wast
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 08:45:18PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > Wouldn't it be better to get more buildds for those archs, then?
>> > That would be a totally appropriate use of Debian money...
>>
>> Speaking of which. It would also tot
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 08:45:18PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to get more buildds for those archs, then?
> > That would be a totally appropriate use of Debian money...
>
> Speaking of which. It would also totally be an appropriate use of Debian
> money to get new porter bo
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:19:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/08/11 at 19:52 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On 2011-08-11, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > >> Think of both user systems and the Debian buildds which will waste more
> > >> time - an especially bad problem on slower architectures.
10 matches
Mail list logo
