Re: Small transition: protobuf 2.4.0

2011-02-24 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2011/2/21 Iustin Pop : > Hi all, > > I've uploaded to experimental the new protobuf version (2.4.0a) and this > brings as always a SONAME increase. It also has a new experimental > backend (C++-based) for the Python language bindings, hence the > heads-up. > > Here is the list of packages that

Re: Small transition: protobuf 2.4.0

2011-02-23 Thread Thomas Koch
Iustin Pop: > Hi all, > > I've uploaded to experimental the new protobuf version (2.4.0a) and this > brings as always a SONAME increase. It also has a new experimental > backend (C++-based) for the Python language bindings, hence the > heads-up. Don't bother about HBase. The current package needs

Re: Small transition: protobuf 2.4.0

2011-02-20 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 08:39:38PM +0100, Jan Dittberner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 07:01:55PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > > Depends: > > python-protobuf.socketrpc > > I maintain this in DPMT. > > The python-protobuf.socketrpc module works fine with python-protobuf from > experimental, the w

Re: Small transition: protobuf 2.4.0

2011-02-20 Thread Jan Dittberner
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 07:01:55PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > Depends: > python-protobuf.socketrpc I maintain this in DPMT. The python-protobuf.socketrpc module works fine with python-protobuf from experimental, the whole test suite works without any issues. > I would appreciate feedback on whet

Small transition: protobuf 2.4.0

2011-02-20 Thread Iustin Pop
Hi all, I've uploaded to experimental the new protobuf version (2.4.0a) and this brings as always a SONAME increase. It also has a new experimental backend (C++-based) for the Python language bindings, hence the heads-up. Here is the list of packages that is affected by this (assuming my grep-dct