Now you say it, I remember that I had already noticed the same name binary.
Thanks for the quick responce and the link.
> Op 11-11-2021 19:28 schreef Andrey Rahmatullin :
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:16:50PM +0100, Ben Tris wrote:
> > Maybe I did make a mistake. Is the description of the fi
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:16:50PM +0100, Ben Tris wrote:
> Maybe I did make a mistake. Is the description of the first binary visible at
> the source package?
No, otherwise all pages would have some description.
The description of the binary with the same name as the source package is
displayed.
Maybe I did make a mistake. Is the description of the first binary visible at
the source package?
Why is there not a seperate description for a source package, I think that
would make more sence, at least I would like to see a short description for the
source.
> Op 29-10-2021 08:29 schreef Andr
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 05:50:02AM +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> Sorry, for instance.
>
> haskell-hopenpgp-tools
Sure, are you saying it had a description before?
Because there is no binary package with this name.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Sorry, for instance.
haskell-hopenpgp-tools
> Op 28-10-2021 13:12 schreef Andrey Rahmatullin :
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:50:05PM +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> > Short descriptions disappeard after a package update.
> Do you have any specific examples?
>
> > Example, just try some.
> > http
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:50:05PM +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> Short descriptions disappeard after a package update.
Do you have any specific examples?
> Example, just try some.
> https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/MaintGroup/Debian_Haskell_Group2021.html
Both packages I tried work as expected.
Note tha
Short descriptions disappeard after a package update.
Example, just try some.
https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/MaintGroup/Debian_Haskell_Group2021.html
Is that suspected?
Maybe handy.
https://www.gezapig.nl/Free.html
7 matches
Mail list logo
