Re: Seeking consensus on file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb

2024-06-18 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
Hi Laszlo, Thank you so much for your efforts in resolving the conflict. Best, Yogeswaran. On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 05:46:55PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/nanopb/nanopb/issues/977 Hi, On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 7:28 AM László Böszörményi (GCS)

Re: Seeking consensus on file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb

2024-06-18 Thread GCS
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/nanopb/nanopb/issues/977 Hi, On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 7:28 AM László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > Thanks for your patience. I'm here just running back and forth. Going > to note nanopb upstream this afternoon. As promised, I reported it to upstream yester

Re: Seeking consensus on file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb

2024-06-16 Thread GCS
Hi all, On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 11:33 PM Yogeswaran Umasankar wrote: > Thank you all for your suggestions. Since there has been no response > from Laszlo, I will implement the recommendations from your suggestions. Thanks for your patience. I'm here just running back and forth. Going to note nan

Re: Seeking consensus on file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb

2024-06-16 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
Hi Thank you all for your suggestions. Since there has been no response from Laszlo, I will implement the recommendations from your suggestions. I will inform the upstream about the conflict caused by the generic name "proto" and suggest a rename. Once I have worked on a patch, I will submit it t

Re: Seeking consensus on file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb

2024-06-11 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 6/11/24 07:40, Yogeswaran Umasankar wrote: It appears that nanopb's use of the module name "proto" does not align with the conventional identification of a Python module. Given this, it might be plausible to make this module private within the nanopb package. This adjustment could potent

Re: Seeking consensus on file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb

2024-06-11 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Laszlo and Yogeswaran, I'm explicitly adding Laszlo to Cc to increase the chances of him chiming in. On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 06:40:02PM -0400, Yogeswaran Umasankar wrote: > There is a file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb. The > conflict arises due to both packages has a file at

Re: Seeking consensus on file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb

2024-06-10 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 06:40:02PM -0400, Yogeswaran Umasankar wrote: > There is a file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb. The > conflict arises due to both packages has a file at > /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py [0]. I am maintaining > python3-proto-plus, and I am se

Seeking consensus on file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb

2024-06-10 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
Hello, There is a file conflict between python3-proto-plus and nanopb. The conflict arises due to both packages has a file at /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py [0]. I am maintaining python3-proto-plus, and I am seeking guidance. The module name "proto" is an integral part of the p