://github.com/itgalaxy/webfont
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Javascript (Node.js)
Description : Generate icon fonts from SVG icons
Webfont converts sets of SVG files into an icon font, in any of the
formats: woff2, woff, eot, ttf and svg. These can then be used in a
Ron Johnson wrote:
> > See RFC 2119. I think usages of may, should, must and stuff should
> > follow these explanations.
Note that RFC 2119 does not mention the phrase "may not". In American
english it clearly means "is not permitted". For clarity in policy
documents "must not" should be used wh
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 11:55:41AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The authoritative document is the menu _manual_:
> > (/usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz), section 3.7
> >
> > An extract from that section:
> >
>
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:56:23AM -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > See RFC 2119. I think usages of may, should, must and stuff should
> > follow these explanations.
>
> There's an RFC for words???
Yes, there is one, to make sure everybody use the words for the same
thing, especi
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 15:49 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:16:06PM -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Note that's a "may" and a "should", not a "must". IIRC they only trigger
> > > lintian warnings, not errors.
> >
> > If I tell my son, "You may not go p
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:16:06PM -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note that's a "may" and a "should", not a "must". IIRC they only trigger
> > lintian warnings, not errors.
>
> If I tell my son, "You may not go play in the rain.", he knows
> that he can't go play in the rain.
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 11:55 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The authoritative document is the menu _manual_:
> > (/usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz), section 3.7
> >
> > An extract from that section:
> >
> >
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The authoritative document is the menu _manual_:
> (/usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz), section 3.7
>
> An extract from that section:
>
> Debian package maintainers should ensure that any icons they include
xels, although smaller
sizes are ok.
> Note that svg icons work in a gnome environment. Because gramps is
> a gnome program and upstream will only be distributing an svg icon
> starting with the next major release, I may just stick with that.
> There are usually other issues, th
aintaining the
> Debian menu system are best placed to tell what should be allowed or
> not.
It is precisely because the menu policy does not say anything about
icons that I brought this up here. 'man menufile' states that an icon
can be specified but nothing else.
Note that svg icon
Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, Dec 08, 2004:
> To summarize, I think recommending SVG would require a change to the policy.
It's defined in the _Menu_ Policy. I think the people maintaining the
Debian menu system are best placed to tell what should be allowed or
not.
Additionally,
gt; should be handled. So,
>
> I don't think that's much different from PNG icons.
>
>> What is the proper way to handle svg icons?
>> For example, where should they be placed?
>
> GNOME places them under /usr/share/icons/$THEME/scalable.
>
>> How well are
Le mardi 07 dÃcembre 2004 Ã 23:51 -0500, James A. Treacy a Ãcrit :
> SVG use is increasing and I have seen nothing in Debian about how they
> should be handled. So,
I don't think that's much different from PNG icons.
> What is the proper way to handle svg icons?
> For exam
SVG use is increasing and I have seen nothing in Debian about how they
should be handled. So,
What is the proper way to handle svg icons?
For example, where should they be placed?
How well are they supported?
Should a non-svg icon also be included?
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
