Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

Le mercredi 26 mai 2010 à 23:19 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit : > I realise that, but it's not default in various web browsers. (Well, > most I've used seem to support both C-PgUp/C-PgDn and C-TAB/C-S-Tab). > This is probably the major gripe for me each time I end up using > epiphany for anything.

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

]] Josselin Mouette | Le samedi 22 mai 2010 à 08:43 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit : | > | I don't see what you mean by "iffy" tabbed browsing, what's wrong with | > | tabbed browsing in Epiphany? | > | > For me, at least two things: | > | > - C-TAB/C-S-TAB doesn't work for switching tabs, I ha

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

Le samedi 22 mai 2010 à 08:43 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit : > | I don't see what you mean by "iffy" tabbed browsing, what's wrong with > | tabbed browsing in Epiphany? > > For me, at least two things: > > - C-TAB/C-S-TAB doesn't work for switching tabs, I have to use > C-PgUp/PgDn. This is

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

]] Fabian Greffrath | Am 18.05.2010 18:02, schrieb Ryan Oram: | | I don't see what you mean by "iffy" tabbed browsing, what's wrong with | tabbed browsing in Epiphany? For me, at least two things: - C-TAB/C-S-TAB doesn't work for switching tabs, I have to use C-PgUp/PgDn. - The tabs are alwa

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > I don't see what you mean by "iffy" tabbed browsing, what's wrong with > tabbed browsing in Epiphany? And regarding Javascript, I have never > experienced the issues you describe. Are you sure you are using the latest > packages (i.e. brow

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

Am 18.05.2010 18:02, schrieb Ryan Oram: Epiphany has iffy tabbed browsing support and the Javascript engine is incomplete (I can't edit posts on many forums for example). It's a great browser and should be worked on, but we should take as many avenues as possible. I don't see what you mean by "

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: > > opt-in like in the Options dialog ? > > "Show suggestions for navigation errors" > > "Use a suggestion service to help complete searches and URLs typed in > the address bar" > > "Use DNS pre-fetching to improve load performance" > > There is

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

I demand that Ryan Oram may or may not have written... > http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_chrome_vs_iron.php > This should become a full open source project with a community behind it. > With Mozilla disregarding H.264, the community needs a full browser capable > of H.264 video play

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

]] Mike Hommey | opt-in like in the Options dialog ? «opt-in» usually means «requires active effort to be enabled», so in this case, disabled by default. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:39:00PM -0400, Ryan Oram wrote: > >From the Ubuntu mailing list, in case of you aren't subscribed there: > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Dane Mutters wrote: > > I think some of you would be interested in reading this page that > > (allegedly) documents some of the

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On Wednesday 19 May 2010 02:39:00 Ryan Oram wrote: > I wasn't aware of this when I posted this thread on the mailing list. > I still feel, however, the suggestion and DNS-prefetching features be > made opt-in. What do you mean by "opt-in"? I have searched and the only meaning i could find was abou

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Ryan Oram wrote: > >From the Ubuntu mailing list, in case of you aren't subscribed there: > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Dane Mutters wrote: > > I think some of you would be interested in reading this page that > > (allegedly) documents some of the (alleged

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

>From the Ubuntu mailing list, in case of you aren't subscribed there: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Dane Mutters wrote: > I think some of you would be interested in reading this page that > (allegedly) documents some of the (allegedly) somewhat shady > beginnings of Iron: > > http://neugierig

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

Il 18/05/2010 19:12, Ryan Oram ha scritto: > "Chrome Incognito Tracks Visited Sites" > http://www.lewiz.org/2010/05/chrome-incognito-tracks-visited-sites.html I just backported upstream commit that fixes this huge privacy killer bug... > This seems to be becoming a theme. As Chromium has much of

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

Hi. AFAIK, even Chrome has disabled most tracking stuff per default (except those things which FF/etc. do too). With chromium, it was regarded to be a (reportable) bug if anything that is privacy sensitive could not be disabled, IIRC. And regarding Iron,... the following might be interesting: ht

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Ryan Oram wrote: > "Chrome Incognito Tracks Visited Sites" > http://www.lewiz.org/2010/05/chrome-incognito-tracks-visited-sites.html > > This seems to be becoming a theme. As Chromium has much of the same > privacy issues as Chrome (SRWare Iron is made from Chromiu

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

Don't hold back, John. Tell us how you really feel. On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:30 PM, John Moser wrote: > Shut up.  You're whining like a raving politicized lune and nobody is > listening to your monologue. > > Apply some critical thinking skills.  It's a bug in a special mode of a > browser, a mo

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

Shut up. You're whining like a raving politicized lune and nobody is listening to your monologue. Apply some critical thinking skills. It's a bug in a special mode of a browser, a mode that doesn't store history/cookies. It's not (known to be) sharing anything with the 'net, so it's innocuous a

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On 18 May 2010, Philipp Kern wrote: >No, we don't (unless trademark rules apply). It's Chromium, not Chrome btw, >that site doesn't speak a word about Chromium. > >Kind regards, >Philipp Kern Most of the privacy issues of Chrome are present in Chromium as well. These "features" need to be remove

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

"Chrome Incognito Tracks Visited Sites" http://www.lewiz.org/2010/05/chrome-incognito-tracks-visited-sites.html This seems to be becoming a theme. As Chromium has much of the same privacy issues as Chrome (SRWare Iron is made from Chromium and the code is striped from Chromium), this "feature" is

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> With Mozilla disregarding H.264, the community needs a full >> browser capable of H.264 video playback without the privacy issues of >> Chrome. > > > > You may need to install some additio

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

With Mozilla disregarding H.264, the community needs a full browser capable of H.264 video playback without the privacy issues of Chrome. You may need to install some additional gstreamer plugins, though. Cheers, Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

On 2010-05-18, Ryan Oram wrote: > http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_chrome_vs_iron.php > > This should become a full open source project with a community behind > it. With Mozilla disregarding H.264, the community needs a full > browser capable of H.264 video playback without the priva

SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_chrome_vs_iron.php This should become a full open source project with a community behind it. With Mozilla disregarding H.264, the community needs a full browser capable of H.264 video playback without the privacy issues of Chrome. We need to "Icewease