Re: Re: SAGE packages for Debian

Global media blogs games apps google maps hello world media world largest social media hate crime Sent from my iPhone

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

On Thu, 15 May 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's probably a good plan, especially since the sandbox is apparently going to be eliminated eventually (and it sounds like arpack and delaunay are on the list of things like

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's probably a good plan, especially since the sandbox is apparently > going to be eliminated eventually (and it sounds like arpack and delaunay > are on the list of things likely to be merged into mainline scipy) > >

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

Yes, I realize there is not much time left. I'm also quite busy for the next week or two, after which point I should have time to work on this again. The precise release timeline is very helpful. I won't be able to reasonably maintain this much software in Debian in the long term, but I will

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

Hi, wow, great! You're aware that you need to be done in just a bit more than six weeks to achieve your goal of being part of lenny? http://release.debian.org/emails/release-update-200801 regards, Holger pgpanKqExinsP.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

Since I didn't hear any objections, I went ahead and filed the RFP bug reports (RFP rather than ITP bugs because I'm looking for help maintaining them -- though maybe RFA or RFH would have been clearer) as I described in my original email. I noted this problem in the Singular copyright file on

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

That's probably a good plan, especially since the sandbox is apparently going to be eliminated eventually (and it sounds like arpack and delaunay are on the list of things likely to be merged into mainline scipy) I'll send t

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:44:04AM -0400, Timothy G Abbott wrote: > Packages with no problems worse than missing man pages: > python-arpack (from the scipy sandbox) > python-delaunay (from the scipy sandbox) I guess these can be handled by python-modules team that already maintains python-scipy?

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

On Tue, 6 May 2008, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: I was going to suggest setting up an Alioth project, but on closer look I see that the Sage Wiki page mentions that you don't want to use alioth just yet. Well, that text was written in November, and I think it was a good choice at the time. But it

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

Timothy G Abbott wrote: > I've been working on packaging for Debian SAGE (http://sagemath.org), > a large free mathematics software conglomeration that is competing > with proprietary mathematical software systems such as Mathematica, > Matlab, Maple, and Magma (Debian bug #455292). [...] > I

Re: SAGE packages for Debian

* Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080506 08:47]: > singular [no soname] Oh, nice to see that the omalloc license issue is finally solved. The debian/copyright of that package lack a bit deal however, as it does not list the copyright holders of the subpackages. Hochachtungsvoll, Ber

SAGE packages for Debian

I've been working on packaging for Debian SAGE (http://sagemath.org), a large free mathematics software conglomeration that is competing with proprietary mathematical software systems such as Mathematica, Matlab, Maple, and Magma (Debian bug #455292). This has been a rather large effort becaus