> James R Van Zandt writes:
James> However, a relative newcomer might want to change his
James> answers (having learned things since answering the first
James> time).
! You're kidding! ;-)
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom)
http://www.inetarena.com/~karlheg
Portl
David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Let dpkg/diety do something like this:
>0. The question was already answered during an old install (and stored
> via dtxtdb or something better) -> take that answer
...
If this feature is implemented, it should be governed by a
meta-question. An experienc
> But I thought most people already complain, that there are too many
> questions in the installer scripts (postinst).
>
> What do the others think about this?
We probably should ask all questions at the end once?
Let dpkg/diety do something like this:
0. The question was already answer
Christian Schwarz writes:
> > > However, we should probably distinguish between "local daemons" and
> > > "network daemons". I think it is pretty safe to start "lpd" on every
> > > machine, since the default configuration would not accept queries from
> > > foreign hosts. If I install the "lpd" pa
On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Christian Schwarz writes:
>
> > > > The situation looks completely different if the server has its own
> > > > package, like `msqld' for the server and `msql' for the client.
> > >
> > > Not really -- the user should still be prompted (or have some co
Mark Eichin writes:
>
> > The situation looks completely different if the server has its own
> > package, like `msqld' for the server and `msql' for the client.
>
> Not really -- the user should still be prompted (or have some control
> over it) because the daemon package probably contains the
>
Christian Schwarz writes:
> > > The situation looks completely different if the server has its own
> > > package, like `msqld' for the server and `msql' for the client.
> >
> > Not really -- the user should still be prompted (or have some control
> > over it) because the daemon package probably c
On 27 Jun 1997, Mark Eichin wrote:
>
> > The situation looks completely different if the server has its own
> > package, like `msqld' for the server and `msql' for the client.
>
> Not really -- the user should still be prompted (or have some control
> over it) because the daemon package probably
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Therefore I recommend changing our policy slightly. I'll write down a
> paragraph for our policy later (or would you like to step forward,
> Christian?).
>
> If a package contains both a server and a client, and the server
> opens another possibil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Good evening,
The most recent security post on bugtraq reminds me on this proposal.
I have noticed that Debian packages are randomly installing services
(except for rwhod).
What I mean is that there are some Debian packages that contain both a
server and a clie
> The situation looks completely different if the server has its own
> package, like `msqld' for the server and `msql' for the client.
Not really -- the user should still be prompted (or have some control
over it) because the daemon package probably contains the
*documentation* for the daemon! I
11 matches
Mail list logo
