> > > Find someone (preferably a team) to be the maintainers, prepare a
> > > suitable package, get someone to sponsor it, and reopen all the
> > > bugs which were closed by the removal.
I volunteer to help with the packaging work. I'm not a Debian Developer, so we
would need sponsors anyway, but
The Wanderer writes ("Re: Restoring the removed e16 package"):
> On this point, I've already been advised (by Bart Martens, in
> off-list mail) that debian-mentors would probably be a more
> appropriate venue.
Fair enough. I'll try to keep my response here to one po
On 08/28/2012 06:51 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
The Wanderer writes ("Restoring the removed e16 package"):
I'm not positive whether this properly belongs here; if it would be more
appropriate on another mailing list, just let me know which one.
On this point, I've already b
The Wanderer writes ("Restoring the removed e16 package"):
> I'm not positive whether this properly belongs here; if it would be more
> appropriate on another mailing list, just let me know which one.
...
> As e17 does not constitute a suitable replacement for e16 for
I'm not positive whether this properly belongs here; if it would be more
appropriate on another mailing list, just let me know which one.
I'm a long-time user of e16, which has been removed from Debian, per bug 619707.
The reasons cited for removal are that it has been replaced by e17, that it i
5 matches
Mail list logo
