Re: Request to NMU libsafe

2001-12-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:53:01PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > - the package does not build a -dev package. Correct? > - the package overwrites the old library? Correct, if it's an it is a preloaded wrapper lib, you do not need to have a -dev package and you do not need versioning. It is overwr

Re: Request to NMU libsafe

2001-12-27 Thread Yotam Rubin
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:53:01PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Yotam Rubin writes: > > Greetings, > > > > The last libsafe upload has been over a year ago. Since then, libsafe > > has accumulated a large number of bugs. The current Debian release doesn't > > seem to be very effective. I've

Re: Request to NMU libsafe

2001-12-27 Thread Ron Rademaker
You're right that I haven't done anything about libsafe where I should have... I guess the best thing to do right now is put libsafe up for adoption. |---| |Ron Rademaker |

Re: Request to NMU libsafe

2001-12-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Yotam Rubin writes: > Greetings, > > The last libsafe upload has been over a year ago. Since then, libsafe > has accumulated a large number of bugs. The current Debian release doesn't > seem to be very effective. I've packaged the latest libsafe and made it > available at: http://192.117.13

Request to NMU libsafe

2001-12-27 Thread Yotam Rubin
Greetings, The last libsafe upload has been over a year ago. Since then, libsafe has accumulated a large number of bugs. The current Debian release doesn't seem to be very effective. I've packaged the latest libsafe and made it available at: http://192.117.130.34/Fendor/debian/libsafe/ Ca