Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:10:51AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
>> as described in
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
>> I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
>> correctly are
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:10:51AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
> as described in
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
> I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
> correctly are at the moment 7 different IRC-daemons in Debian and th
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Request for virtual package ircd"):
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > m-t-a's must conflict because they are required by policy to provide a
> > sendmail program at a fixed filesystem location.
>
> I was abo
Brian May writes:
>> "Michael" == Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> Why do you think these servers conflict with each other?
>
> ... because, generally speaking, the servers will be automatically
> installed at installation, and if the port is in use, then
> installati
Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:38:03AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>> Wouldn't "relay-chat-server" or "relay-chat-daemon" be a better name.
>
> I think no, we also call it "httpd" and not "web-server" or
> "hypertext-transfer-protocol-server".
That's a hist
> "Michael" == Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Why do you think these servers conflict with each other?
... because, generally speaking, the servers will be automatically
installed at installation, and if the port is in use, then
installation may fail. Also, the server
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> m-t-a's must conflict because they are required by policy to provide a
> sendmail program at a fixed filesystem location.
I was about to say the same thing earlier, but then realized that we
*could* deal with that via alternatives. And there's actuall
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:15AM +0200, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:34:41PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > It's also possible to run multiple FTP servers, each listening on a
> > different port, but all the packaged ftp daemons "Conflicts:
> > ftp-server".
> That is bad, I
"Jeremy Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:14:19AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
Ok, this is a good argument.
I think the oppinion is more or less clear:
Some people think it would be a nice idea, BUT it can be also a problem
because so
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:14:19AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
> Ok, this is a good argument.
> I think the oppinion is more or less clear:
>
> Some people think it would be a nice idea, BUT it can be also a problem
> because some people want more than one Ircd on a system.
>
> I only wanted to ask
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:10:51AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as described in
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
> I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
> correctly are at the moment 7 different IRC-daemons in Debian
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:55:57AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Those packages should not depend on ircd anyway, because the service and
> the ircd can run on different systems.
Ok, this is a good argument.
I think the oppinion is more or less clear:
Some people think it would be a nice idea, B
On 12/10/06 at 00:10 +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as described in
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
> I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
> correctly are at the moment 7 different IRC-daemons in Debian and they
> lo
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:34:41PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> It's also possible to run multiple FTP servers, each listening on a
> different port, but all the packaged ftp daemons "Conflicts:
> ftp-server".
That is bad, IMO. (and chance to raise my opinion about virtual
packages ;) )
Conflicts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/06 17:58, Mario Iseli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:38:03AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>> Wouldn't "relay-chat-server" or "relay-chat-daemon" be a better name.
>
> I think no, we also call it "httpd" and not "web-server" or
> "hypert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/06 17:50, tony mancill wrote:
> Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On Oct 12, Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> as described in
>>> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
>>> I announce here my idea of the v
Mario Iseli writes:
> Hello,
>
> as described in
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
> I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
> correctly are at the moment 7 different IRC-daemons in Debian and they
> logically conflict with each
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:38:03AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Wouldn't "relay-chat-server" or "relay-chat-daemon" be a better name.
I think no, we also call it "httpd" and not "web-server" or
"hypertext-transfer-protocol-server".
> Only if they really work with _all_ of them, even new ones.
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 12, Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> as described in
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
>> I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
>> correctly are at the moment 7 different IRC-daemons in
On Oct 12, Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as described in
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
> I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
> correctly are at the moment 7 different IRC-daemons in Debian and they
> logically
Am Donnerstag 12 Oktober 2006 00:10 schrieb Mario Iseli:
> as described in
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
> I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
> correctly are at the moment 7 different IRC-daemons in Debian and they
> logi
Hello,
as described in
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
I announce here my idea of the virtual package ircd. When I count
correctly are at the moment 7 different IRC-daemons in Debian and they
logically conflict with each other. So I would think an officia
22 matches
Mail list logo
