Re: Renaming libraries from upstream

2007-09-09 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > What's the best way forward? > > 5. something else? How about convincing upstream that too generic library names are not a good idea? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Renaming libraries from upstream

2007-09-09 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/07 03:47, Neil Williams wrote: > GPE includes libschedule which, when I originally packaged it, I > thought was a likely candidate for a name collision either now or later > because GPE is a small (self-contained) environment and 'schedule' is

Renaming libraries from upstream

2007-09-09 Thread Neil Williams
GPE includes libschedule which, when I originally packaged it, I thought was a likely candidate for a name collision either now or later because GPE is a small (self-contained) environment and 'schedule' is such a common thing to do in software. So I renamed the Debian package libgpeschedule to mak