On Monday 12 December 2005 14.48, Nico Golde wrote:
> So what do you think should I request a removal or wait for
> an adopter?
Upstream dead, a few annoying bugs, replacements available in Debian.
I think quite a clear case. Since it still works, I would not do the
wrapper thing Goswin sugges
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The package is in a fairly good state but has some annoying
> bugs [1]. So I played a bit with gqview which seems be a
> good replacement. It has all features gtksee has and a bit
> more.
Would it be possible to add a wraper for gqview that translates t
Hi,
I intend to request the removal of the gtksee package from
the archive. So let me explain why.
I adopted the package in July 2004 and had a pretty active
assosiation with the upstream author.
During the time upstream authors absence became more and
more frequent and after some time he maile
3 matches
Mail list logo
