Re: [clamav-users] Remove clamav-unofficial-sigs

2016-04-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > Luca is no longer with the ClamAV project. Removed from CC. > our community signature program: Unfortunately this isn't suitable for the distribution of the 3rd-party rules that we are talking about, there is a list of the current on

Re: [clamav-users] Remove clamav-unofficial-sigs

2016-04-10 Thread Joel Esler (jesler)
> On Apr 10, 2016, at 12:10 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote: >> 2016-04-06 6:55 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise: >>> Personally I am still waiting for clamav freshclam to properly support >>> third-party signatures, so clamav-unofficial-sigs can be a config fil

Re: Remove clamav-unofficial-sigs

2016-04-09 Thread Francois Gouget
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote: [...] > > A year ago a user also mentioned that there is a new upstream version > I have some doubts about the quality of this fork, so I plan to > investigate in detail what has changed before blindly adopting it. What about uploading a new version with t

Re: Remove clamav-unofficial-sigs

2016-04-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote: > 2016-04-06 6:55 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise: >> Personally I am still waiting for clamav freshclam to properly support >> third-party signatures, so clamav-unofficial-sigs can be a config file. > > Is there a tracking bug for this? How can we help? T

Re: Remove clamav-unofficial-sigs

2016-04-06 Thread Mathieu Parent
2016-04-06 6:55 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : > On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 00:35 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: I didn't knew about those third-party signatures. This is a good news for me. >> I was discussing this yeasterday with Paul. >> While the current package has some issues I believe that it is already >>

Re: Remove clamav-unofficial-sigs

2016-04-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 00:35 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I was discussing this yeasterday with Paul. > While the current package has some issues I believe that it is already  > quite useful as is, so if the alternative is to remove it from the  > archive then I am going to adopt it. It would be g

Re: Remove clamav-unofficial-sigs

2016-04-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 05, Francois Gouget wrote: > clamav-unofficial-sigs is broken and not maintained anymore. So unless > something changes there is no point leaving it in the repository. I was discussing this yeasterday with Paul. While the current package has some issues I believe that it is already quite

Remove clamav-unofficial-sigs

2016-04-05 Thread Francois Gouget
clamav-unofficial-sigs is broken and not maintained anymore. So unless something changes there is no point leaving it in the repository. clamav-unofficial-sigs is broken because of changes in securiteinfo. This issue has been reported a year ago and has not even been acknowledged by the devel