On 2011-03-10, Roger Leigh wrote:
> But neither are particularly ideal. They originated as flat-file
> Perl MLDBM databases which were later upgraded to use PostgreSQL,
> but due to the interface imposed upon them by the historic design
> are really not that well suited to the task. Due to the l
On 2011-03-10, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> buildd in unstable was severely broken for ages, because the packages
>> weren't at all tested after heavy refactorings (and still aren't
>> because the maintainer doesn't have a test setup). wanna-build will
>> have suffered the same fate.
> The main sticking
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 07:57:44PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-03-10, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > On 03/10/2011 06:56 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> On 2011-03-10, Hector Oron wrote:
> >>> I was planning to start using a wanna-build instance, but i was not
> >>> sure which one to use.
> >>> A
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 05:24:25PM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello Roger,
>
> 2011/3/10 Roger Leigh :
>
> > This mail is really just to find out: is anyone actually using the
> > wanna-build package in the archive? popcon indicates that a few
> > people have it installed, and < 10 have ever us
On 2011-03-10, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 06:56 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On 2011-03-10, Hector Oron wrote:
>>> I was planning to start using a wanna-build instance, but i was not
>>> sure which one to use.
>>> As I have not yet started to use any of them I have no real objection
>>> f
On 03/10/2011 06:56 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-03-10, Hector Oron wrote:
>> I was planning to start using a wanna-build instance, but i was not
>> sure which one to use.
>> As I have not yet started to use any of them I have no real objection
>> for its removal, on the other hand I would no
On 2011-03-10, Hector Oron wrote:
> I was planning to start using a wanna-build instance, but i was not
> sure which one to use.
> As I have not yet started to use any of them I have no real objection
> for its removal, on the other hand I would not mind to try to merge
> current wb used on buildd
Hello Roger,
2011/3/10 Roger Leigh :
> This mail is really just to find out: is anyone actually using the
> wanna-build package in the archive? popcon indicates that a few
> people have it installed, and < 10 have ever used it. Would
> migrating to wanna-build.git be realistic for these users?
On 2011-03-10, Roger Leigh wrote:
> This mail is really just to find out: is anyone actually using the
> wanna-build package in the archive?
Given that I know bits of the sbuild.git codebase: Try to run it. If it
doesn't immediately explode there might be users. If it does and there
are no repo
sbuild (sbuild.git) builds packages for sbuild, wanna-build and
buildd. Of these, only sbuild and buildd are actively maintained.
The wanna-build instance used on the buildds is maintained
independently in a separate wanna-build.git repository. Given that
wanna-build in sbuild.git is not maintain
10 matches
Mail list logo
