Hi!
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:48:44 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]
> > Since Debian-Policy 3.9.0 architecture wild cards are allowed so this
> > dependency would become
> > libudev-dev (>= 0.139) [linux-any]
> > and the type-handling aliases (which are hack according t
* Julien Cristau | 2010-07-02 16:20:24 [+0100]:
>> This started as Kyle (Cc) filled #585767 because some packages failed to
>> build on powerpcspe (not official, in debian-ports atm). The gnu
>> triplet there is powerpc-linux-gnuspe so type-handling provides
>> not+linux-gnu. This is also the case
[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]
> Since Debian-Policy 3.9.0 architecture wild cards are allowed so this
> dependency would become
> libudev-dev (>= 0.139) [linux-any]
> and the type-handling aliases (which are hack according to #585767)
> could go. Based on this and the fact that some packages are al
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 10:48 -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> Policy only allows these wildcards for the build-time fields. In
> libgnomevfs2-dev (subject of bug 587877), it is a regular Depends:, and
> your wildcard solution will not work.
>
> Unless, that is, dpkg-gencontrol expands th
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 16:01:01 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This started as Kyle (Cc) filled #585767 because some packages failed to
> build on powerpcspe (not official, in debian-ports atm). The gnu
> triplet there is powerpc-linux-gnuspe so type-handling provides
> not+linux-gnu.
Hi,
first of all, I'm really sorry for filling 23 bugs without discussing
this here.
This started as Kyle (Cc) filled #585767 because some packages failed to
build on powerpcspe (not official, in debian-ports atm). The gnu
triplet there is powerpc-linux-gnuspe so type-handling provides
not+linux-g
6 matches
Mail list logo
